Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sandra Bullock Battles Porn Star Janine Lindemulder for Child Custody
CBS CrimeSider ^ | October 29, 2009 4:19 PM | Edecio Martinez

Posted on 11/04/2009 7:55:41 AM PST by TexasCajun

PORTLAND, Ore. (CBS/AP) Hollywood actress Sandra Bullock is embroiled in a custody battle between her husband and his porn star ex-wife.

Bullock is standing by her celebrity-mechanic husband, Jesse James, as he fights his ex-wife Janine Lindemulder's attempts to regain custody of their five-year-old daughter, Sunny.

James has had sole guardianship of the child since Lindemulder, an adult film star

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Society; TV/Movies; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: bullock; jessejames
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

1 posted on 11/04/2009 7:55:42 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

Which one is the porn star? Or is there really any difference?


2 posted on 11/04/2009 7:56:48 AM PST by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

Would it be possible for the custody battle to be decided by oil wrestling?


3 posted on 11/04/2009 7:57:14 AM PST by jyoders19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

Nasty tattoos.


4 posted on 11/04/2009 7:57:26 AM PST by Huntress (Who the hell are you to tell me what's in my best interests?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

What a waste of a good porn star.

Why the tats, Janine?

Best,

Chris


5 posted on 11/04/2009 7:57:53 AM PST by section9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

Foster care.


6 posted on 11/04/2009 7:58:11 AM PST by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Honestly I don’t think Bullock has ever done any particularly racy scenes in any of her movies.


7 posted on 11/04/2009 8:00:09 AM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: abb

Bullock is no porn star...she has a decent rep actually.


8 posted on 11/04/2009 8:00:11 AM PST by wardaddy (folks, these freepathons are taking too long tightwads, shame on us in front of the kooks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

She was a pretty lady, pre-tattoos (and pre-being a whore).


9 posted on 11/04/2009 8:00:21 AM PST by TheThirdRuffian (Nothing to see here. Move along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian

Tatoos suck.

Bullock sucks.

James sucks.

Start a vacuum cleaning service.

Kid reports to foster home.


10 posted on 11/04/2009 8:02:33 AM PST by mountaineer1997
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: section9

11 posted on 11/04/2009 8:03:28 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

Are there any other ways to insert the words “porn star” or variations thereof into the article?

“...Bullock, not a porn star, is standing by her celebrity-mechanic-but-not-adult-film-star husband, Jesse James, who is also not a porn star, but who has a name like an adult film star, as he fights his ex-wife porn star Janine Lindemulder’s attempts to regain custody of their five-year-old daughter, Sunny, who under no circumstances would be an adult film star before she was eighteen years old, but after then could legally become a porn star, like her porn star mother, the porn star.”


12 posted on 11/04/2009 8:04:08 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

And what a shame I find Sandra Yummy


13 posted on 11/04/2009 8:04:29 AM PST by al baby (Hi Mom sarc ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer1997

Janine was a LOT more attractive pre-tattooing.


14 posted on 11/04/2009 8:04:39 AM PST by jyoders19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All

Sandra Bullock has ZERO legal standing in this issue no matter what state the argument is being heard in.

She is by blood unrelated to the child and only married to the Father; that gives her ZERO rights with the child.

Very misleading headline.


15 posted on 11/04/2009 8:05:18 AM PST by HD1200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

I’m old. I remember Janine just did Penthouse pics for many years....then lesbican crap and then full blown.

She did a homemade movie with Vince Neil where that clown had trouble “performing” with her and another girl...so much for rock star virility.

James seems to have reconstructed his life in a good way and Bullock is the reason...I hope they win. Reports in the media on Janine are not good....wacky....but she looked much better as a young tat-free lass. Any pretty woman debases herself with that self mutilation to that extent has self esteem issues....grave ones....not to mention hardcore porn is a Rubicon moment period.


16 posted on 11/04/2009 8:05:34 AM PST by wardaddy (folks, these freepathons are taking too long tightwads, shame on us in front of the kooks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby

She’s one of my favorites too.

Be well al baby.


17 posted on 11/04/2009 8:05:39 AM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer1997

What do you have against Sandra?


18 posted on 11/04/2009 8:05:54 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian

19 posted on 11/04/2009 8:06:22 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

And seems to be one of the busiest actors out there. you have a good day


20 posted on 11/04/2009 8:07:04 AM PST by al baby (Hi Mom sarc ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson