To: TexasCajun
Which one is the porn star? Or is there really any difference?
2 posted on
11/04/2009 7:56:48 AM PST by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: abb
What a waste of a good porn star.
Why the tats, Janine?
Best,
Chris
5 posted on
11/04/2009 7:57:53 AM PST by
section9
To: abb
Honestly I don’t think Bullock has ever done any particularly racy scenes in any of her movies.
7 posted on
11/04/2009 8:00:09 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
To: abb
Bullock is no porn star...she has a decent rep actually.
8 posted on
11/04/2009 8:00:11 AM PST by
wardaddy
(folks, these freepathons are taking too long tightwads, shame on us in front of the kooks)
To: abb
Which one is the porn star?
The blond with all the tats.
Or is there really any difference?
Well, the porn star gets filmed having sex for a living and Sandra Bullock doesn't. Whether that's a real difference depends on perspective.
To: abb
29 posted on
11/04/2009 8:20:22 AM PST by
stuartcr
(If we are truly made in the image of God, why do we have faults?)
To: abb
>>Which one is the porn star? Or is there really any difference?<<
The one in the middle picture.
60 posted on
11/04/2009 8:49:00 AM PST by
RobRoy
(The US today: Revelation 18:4)
To: abb
Sandra has the common sense of A Box Of Rocks. Duh!
85 posted on
11/04/2009 2:00:45 PM PST by
gathersnomoss
(General George Patton had it right.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson