Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/28/2009 2:34:39 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: SunkenCiv; xcamel; steelyourfaith

Vertical uncertainty ping.


2 posted on 10/28/2009 2:35:35 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

Fascinating...just the North Carolina sea levels are rising!


3 posted on 10/28/2009 2:35:51 PM PDT by Redleg Duke ("Don't fire unless fired upon, but it they mean to have a war, let it begin here." J Parker, 1775)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

The article says “in the last 500 years”. What caused it to rise 500 years ago? Was the earth experiencing “global warming” then? Was it man made?


4 posted on 10/28/2009 2:37:41 PM PDT by basil (It's time to rid the country of "Gun Free Zones" aka "Killing Fields")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

The Sea isn’t rising. NC is sinking. Relativity is a funny thing.


6 posted on 10/28/2009 2:38:28 PM PDT by ArtyFO (I love to smoke cigars when I adjust artillery fire at the moonbat loonery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

I have not noticed it much around here.

I would think it would just kinda’ spill over into VA and SC’s part of the ocean.


8 posted on 10/28/2009 2:38:36 PM PDT by PeteB570 (NRA - Life member and Black Rifle owner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

O CRAP!! I live in N.C.!!


9 posted on 10/28/2009 2:39:17 PM PDT by rsobin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

has shown that sea-level rise, at least in North Carolina, is accelerating.

I think N.Carolina is actually sinking.


11 posted on 10/28/2009 2:39:41 PM PDT by READINABLUESTATE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

North Carolina seas are rising, but luckily this is offset by a drop in the Florida seas.


14 posted on 10/28/2009 2:40:34 PM PDT by Lazamataz (DEFINITION: rac-ist (rA'sis't) 1. Anyone who disagrees with a liberal about any topic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon
In addition, this jump appears to occur between 1879 and 1915, a time of industrial change that may provide a direct link to human-induced climate change.

Gee, that correlates to the warming after the Dalton Minimum.

15 posted on 10/28/2009 2:40:39 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon
Since there is no significant ice mass melting from land, this can only mean one thing: THE OCEANS ARE SHRINKING!
18 posted on 10/28/2009 2:41:32 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon
Good News....for you upland Tar Heels who always wanted water front property....

from your new beach, you will be able to watch the melting icebergs float by with the sunglass clad polar bears riding atop.....

20 posted on 10/28/2009 2:43:03 PM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon
This study makes no sense. CO2 output before 1915 was only a tiny fraction of total global CO2 output levels of the last 30 years, so if CO2 was causing higher sea levels then that rise in sea levels should have happened in the last 30 years, not before 1915. Did the people who wrote this study really conclude that rising sea levels are connected to CO2, and if so why? There's no statistical correlation in this study.

Let's kill the cap and tax plan permanently. Global warming theory (warming caused by CO2) is a complete hoax pushed by supporters of global income redistribution and world government. The IPCC's climate forecasting model is riddled with errors.

21 posted on 10/28/2009 2:43:45 PM PDT by your local physicist (If the Canadians and Brazilians can drill for oil off their Atlantic coast, why can't we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

OMG 3 mm per year somewhere in a thousand years or so I will care


22 posted on 10/28/2009 2:44:29 PM PDT by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; gruffwolf; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

FReepmail me to get on or off

Ping me if you find one I've missed.


More of the usual Bravo Sierra Sea levels hav been rising at roughly the same rate for 12,000 years.
23 posted on 10/28/2009 2:44:41 PM PDT by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

3.3 millimeters. WE ARE SUPPOSED TO BELIEVE THIS CRAP?!?!?!


26 posted on 10/28/2009 2:46:16 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

That’s what they get for becoming a blue state last year. ;-)


27 posted on 10/28/2009 2:46:36 PM PDT by Allegra (It doesn't matter what this tagline says...the liberals are going to call it "racist.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon
Well it appears North Carolina is sucking up all that extra water, Whoopeeeeee for the rest of us.
Global warming problem solved!!!
30 posted on 10/28/2009 2:47:07 PM PDT by The Cajun (Mind numbed robot , ditto-head, Hannitized, Levinite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

Somebody in NC left for vacation with the water running.


35 posted on 10/28/2009 2:50:44 PM PDT by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

Must be all the yankees moving to North Carolina from New York and New Jersey.


37 posted on 10/28/2009 2:52:49 PM PDT by Fast Moving Angel (GOP: Stop listening, start doing -- we need new leaders!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon
Since sea level is a reference around the planet the only way to rationalize localized sea level changes is by concluding that the land mass has moved with respect to sea level.
39 posted on 10/28/2009 2:53:44 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson