Posted on 10/24/2009 5:45:30 AM PDT by deaconjim
Notebook: Sec. Clinton | October 23, 2009
As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton's approval rating is at 65 percent, higher than both Michelle and President Barack Obama's. Katie Couric comments that even conservatives are changing their tune.
Yup, post 18 video of him saying just that.
LOL. Imagine an incompetent do-nothing SOS being more popular than an incompetent do-nothing president.
Hillary is the democrat “overcharge” button.
How did THAT happen?
-Oh yeah, she and Slick are out of the limelight-
Agreed. Now that she's seen what 0bama gets away with she would be ruthless. And her minions know how to do it and are more experienced than the university marxist team.
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/10/23/couricandco/entry5415987.shtml
Katie Couric’s Notebook: Hillary Clinton
“Huh, Glenn Beck would have voted for her in the 2008 election? Any confirmation on that remark?”
I heard that comment myself, in the context of, if it were a choice between Obamao and Hillary it would be Hillary.
Please Lord, no. I do not think I could survive the Clintons in front of my face 24/7 again. No, no, no, a thousand times no.
Surely you knew this would happen? Would there be any other reason for her to accept the SOS position?
It’s interesting that they cut out Beck’s explanation for that. Beck said that the progressives would be all behind McCain (since he’s a progressive) and would have used McCain’s status as a GOPer to go out and say it’s all bipartisan. McCain is actually for just about everything Obama is.
Of course, Obama is also aware of who she is, and of what her intentions might be. Soon, it will be time for him to throw her under the bus. The war between the dems that will erupt at that point is going to be interesting to say the least.
Again, disinformation. On her site she said Beck told her he “would” have voted for Hillary. In the interview he said he might have voted for her.
He also goes on to say he thinks McCain would have been worse than Obama. I’d agree, but from the standpoint that we’d have a ostensible Republican taking America down; someone we’d voted for. That to me would be the worst of all bad scenarios.
Not bloody likely.
But I think Hillary would have more personal involvement in her administration compared to Obama letting Axelhead and Manuel and the man behind the curtain take the lead.
Obama wants to party.
Exactly.
She's every bit of a the same socialist as that child in the oval office.
Hey Hillary, when the day comes, ALL of you vermin are going to be tossed into the waste can.
The only reason O is the Prez and not Hillary is that she didn’t make health reform “happen” before and the Powers-That-Be think that The One will now. Then she will traipse on in like Queen of the World -watch out!
“I think Beck believes, as do I, that Hillary would be all of those things, but less capable of making it happen.”
That’s what I’ve always thought - it would be much harder for her to make it happen. There are a lot of people who dislike her personally, and they would fight her much more than Obama. Probably the exact reason he was chosen.
That whole Florida/Michigan thing she agreed to early on was her biggest mistake.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.