Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker

Forgive me for asking, but if the “universe” consists of all matter, energy, and space that exist, how can there be a “parallel universe”? Wouldn’t it be more accurate to say they believe there are parts of the universe that have not yet been discovered?


8 posted on 10/18/2009 4:53:48 AM PDT by deaconjim (Because He lives...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: deaconjim

Its nothing more than pure speculation that they think can be proven according to our mathematics. Of course, scientists 50 years from now will laugh at such a notion. Man has a nasty habit of always thinking he knows absolutely everything and no future generations could ever possibly know more than they do right now.


16 posted on 10/18/2009 5:12:53 AM PDT by MiltonFriedmanFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: deaconjim
Forgive me for asking, but if the “universe” consists of all matter, energy, and space that exist, how can there be a “parallel universe”? Wouldn’t it be more accurate to say they believe there are parts of the universe that have not yet been discovered

Think of reality as a whole as a colon with diverticulitis. The parallel universes are the diverticula.
17 posted on 10/18/2009 5:18:06 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: deaconjim
"Forgive me for asking, but if the “universe” consists of all matter, energy, and space that exist, how can there be a “parallel universe”? Wouldn’t it be more accurate to say they believe there are parts of the universe that have not yet been discovered?"

I think they mean the observable universe. I am no physicist and I only have a slight interest in quantum mechanics but I think the concept is roughly like this:

1. For every outcome in a closed system that is based on some chance quantum level event, the state of that outcome is fluid until observed.
2. It is the act of observing the outcome that places the human observer in one universe or the other.

In other words some event occurs on an infinitesimally small level that can cause two possible observable outcomes. Let's call them outcome A and B. In the writer's belief system the universe splits at this point into two identical observable universes except one contains outcome A and the other outcome B. The human observer is thrown by chance into either one universe or the other. Let's say he finds himself in the outcome A observable universe. At this point the human is completely cut off from contact with the other observable universe where presumably his identical twin lives with outcome B.

Wild stuff.

21 posted on 10/18/2009 5:37:50 AM PDT by Upstate NY Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: deaconjim
Forgive me for asking, but if the “universe” consists of all matter, energy, and space that exist, how can there be a “parallel universe”? Wouldn’t it be more accurate to say they believe there are parts of the universe that have not yet been discovered?
No. The generally accepted use of the term "universe" is "all the matter and energy in this Big Bang". It's everything we can see and measure and trace it's origin back to "the" Big Bang.

Other universes -- other Big Bangs -- are not observable and are outside our "universe".

The whole collective of universes (whether "parallel universes" or "alternate Big Bangs in an Eternal Inflation") are described as the Multiverse (or, by Guth, as the Cosmos).

61 posted on 10/18/2009 5:04:14 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson