This seems to have been an answer to my prayers each time I overhear a libtard claiming "Jesus was a liberal!"
To: IntolerantOfTreason
This is an interesting concept. I’d love to see some specific verses that would be affected by a conservative translation.
2 posted on
10/12/2009 3:51:03 AM PDT by
ottbmare
(I could agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong.)
To: Quoheleth
3 posted on
10/12/2009 4:34:10 AM PDT by
EmilyGeiger
(The problem with socialism, is eventually you run out of other people's money. Margaret Thatcher)
To: IntolerantOfTreason
Just more confusion among the 200 Englsih translations since the 17th century.
Each half century for the pastor 4 centuries, byt the way, has seen a very marked decline in REAL experts in Biblical Greek (NT). Translation capabilities are NOT getting better, they are getting progressively worse.
To: All
This seems to have been an answer to my prayers each time I overhear a libtard claiming "Jesus was a liberal!" IMO, this is little better than the libtards who twist the Truth to fit their ideological agenda. Jesus's teachings, and the Bible, are not a political ideology. They are a moral code, and a path to salvation; no more, no less. The authors of the "Conservative" Bible run just as much risk of twisting God's word, and his plan, to meet their own ends as the libtards do.
Personally, even though I am a conservative, I would stay away from it, and find a good Bible teaching ministry that sticks with the Truth. Do that and you can't help but become a conservative in the way you live your life.
5 posted on
10/12/2009 4:58:20 AM PDT by
Turbo Pig
(...to close with and destroy the enemy...)
To: IntolerantOfTreason
8.Exclude Later-Inserted Liberal Passages: excluding the later-inserted liberal passages that are not authentic, such as the adulteress story
Gobbledygook
"Liberals cite this passage to oppose the death penalty.. The God-ordained government has the responsibility for punishment. Civilized society may not depend on stoning to deter immoral crimes, but it does depend on retribution enforced by people who are themselves sinners."
The would-be stoning of the adultress was illegal from the get-go, possibly trumped up just to trip Jesus:
John 18:31 "Then said Pilate unto them, Take ye him, and judge him according to your law. The Jews therefore said unto him, It is not lawful for us to put any man to death"
This bunch of biblical illiterates should not be allowed within a mile of babelfish.
6 posted on
10/12/2009 4:59:52 AM PDT by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
To: IntolerantOfTreason
I thought Conservapedia was a satire site. Whoops....
8 posted on
10/12/2009 5:20:22 AM PDT by
Mr. Blonde
(You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
To: IntolerantOfTreason
This whole “project” is BS. They’re exchanging Liberal PC spin for Conservative PC spin. Which “interpretation” is worse? My guess is that it’s all a secularist effort to pimp around gullible conservatives that are so wrapped up in their own political philosophies, that they can’t even view religion outside of their constrained view.
Helpful Hint: Christ isn’t about Democrats or Republicans, conservatives or liberals. If you can’t view God outside of your political beliefs, you’re operating at a very simplistic level. Make no mistake, there are plenty of folks that never exceed that standard, but they are easy marks for the charlatans that are pushing this hocum. Don’t be one of them.
11 posted on
10/12/2009 7:39:24 AM PDT by
Habibi
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson