Orly Transcript from July 13 hearing

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation | 10/6/2009 | Orly Taitz

[Elderberry]

Orly references Yesterday with what the Judge said back on July 13

[Dryman]

“FREE THE LONG FORM!”

[Elderberry]

I know. Paragraphs are our friend.

I should have fixed that before I posted.

[so_real]

The Honorable David O. Carter
U.S. District Court
411 W. Fourth St.
Santa Ana, CA 92701
714-338-4750

Polite, supportive, pithy ... do the right thing. If we lose the court, we have no redress as citizens from harms of government. That signifies the end of our civilized republic.

[I am Richard Brandon]

"Then there is no system of justice for the citizens of this country."

I am open minded on this issue, leaning towards 'the birthers do have a case.' However it is quite surprising to me, a non legal person, how every case is dismissed out of hand on a legal technicality. No ruling is ever made on the merits.

The 180 degree about face by this judge just confirms my suspicion that the fix is in and this contention is doomed to fail. Every branch of government has been compromised, and the legal branch must have a gun to its head:

Never a ruling
Never an opinion
Never Discovery

Every case cut off at the pass. But rest easy, we are a Nation of Laws. /sarc

[mnehring]

I thought Orly and Defend Our Freedoms Foundation parted company with each other a while back?

[Elderberry]

That’s what I thought too, but that was what was on the top of her Web page.

[9YearLurker]

Am I naive here, or would I think to call the judge—especially after he’s asked Orly to stop siccing callers after him—would be counterproductive?

[aruanan]

by the usurper and his accomplishes (as you understand US attorneys didn’t use this very language and definitions).

Accomplices?

[mnehring]

?
http://defendourfreedoms.org/

[browardchad]

Polite, supportive, pithy ...

And guaranteed, by Carter, to "go to voice mail and be deleted" per yesterday's hearing.

No, it's not "the right thing," even for Orly supporters. He told her to stop encouraging the calls.

From here on in, it's harassment, pure and simple.

[Elderberry]

Here: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/

[so_real]

My apologies. I was not aware of the Judge's request. So ... perhaps the fix *is* in. Perhaps Carter just wants to be left in solitude so he dismiss the case quietly without considering the precedent he sets by denying citizens' right to redress against government. Shame. Thought he had a pair. Civil War lurks around the corner, I fear.

[browardchad]

On July 13 I was entitled to get a Default judgment against Obama and post default discovery, as I have properly sued Obama as an individual for a fraud that he committed as an individual before the election.

No, as Carter pointed out yesterday, she never properly served Obama as an individual in THIS CASE. She piddled and diddled, and wound up dropping the documents off someplace in DC on January 20 at 3 pm -- after he'd been sworn in as POTUS -- and even then she didn't accomplish proper service, as evidenced seven months later, when Carter had to demand that she serve the U.S. Attorneys, at that moment, in the California courthouse, so that the case could at least go forward to this point.

So she whines and complains about the US Attorney, rather than a private attorney, representing Obama, when it's her own damn fault for not following the rules.

[Elderberry]

Pehaps the next Million and a Half man march will culminate in a Citizen’s Arrest.

[rolling_stone]

Pehaps the next Million and a Half man march will culminate in a Citizen’s Arrest.

Why do you think Obie skipped town last time? No balls to face the people.

[so_real]

Hope it doesn't have to come to that ... but I'll meet you there as need be. Citizens *must* have the right to redress government ... period.

[9YearLurker]

I hear you on the issue of redress and I well understand the frustration, but I’m not so certain the judiciary is the branch for that. Are they not supposed to rule on the facts and the law, rather than on public opinion?

[Elderberry]

No Balls and he’s never had to stand up on his own two feet.

[so_real]

All three branches are equal and check each other's balance, to spin a phrase. Each defends the Constitution and thus protects the rights of citizens (supposedly). Therefore each is an avenue for redress -- remember the Five Boxes of Liberty. I don't believe there is a wrong branch to approach when citizens' rights are encroached upon.