Please correct me if I am wrong.
Leo is going for the dual citizen (british angle)?
When reading the Constitution, and I am no scholar by any means, but wouldn’t Barry have been not eligible due to both parents not having been US citizens?
It looks to me like vital records that were NOT “on record in accordance with state policies and procedures” were used to verify that President Obama is a natural born citizen and born in Hawaii.
Personally—I think that’s OUTRAGEOUS.
British Citizenship Act 1948 automatically granted British Citicenship to EVERY offspring of a (MALE) British Citizen.
The “dual citizenship” angle is a dead letter. NOTHING another country says or does can obviate American citizenship so even if he were declared a citizen of Indonesia it would not matter unless he renounced his American citizenship AS AN ADULT. No one can do it for him as a child.
Neither would having a parent as a non-citizen affect his citizenship IF he were born within the US. If “anchor” babies are citizens (and that is the current understanding unfortunately) then Barry is IF born within the US.
It all boils down to WAS he born here or Kenya? All the rest is just confused lawyering. Clearly we have not been shown any convincing evidence that he was and there are lots of circumstantial evidence that he was NOT.
BTW nothing in the Constitution references the definition of natural born citizenship.