Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Bubba_Leroy

Was wondering if that was still in force. I for one would refuse it - where’s the male equivalent? The idea that any vaccine would be mandatory under penalty of law - and aren’t vaccine’s non-effective against virus’? Like the vaccine you take is for last years whatever that mutated into something else???


8 posted on 09/28/2009 3:57:59 PM PDT by SkyDancer ('Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..' ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: SkyDancer
Was wondering if that was still in force. I for one would refuse it - where’s the male equivalent? The idea that any vaccine would be mandatory under penalty of law - and aren’t vaccine’s non-effective against virus’? Like the vaccine you take is for last years whatever that mutated into something else???

So far, AFAIK, vaccines are only effective against diseases caused by virus, and antibiotics are only effective against diseases caused by bacteria.

So far they aren't giving these vaccines to men, but perhaps they should, since (1) men are generally the ones who transmit the herpes virus which causes cervical cancer to women, and if the man is not a virgin when he marries, the woman is at risk for the virus even if she is perfectly chaste, and (2) recent data connects certain types of throat cancers to this same virus, and throat cancer affects men and women.

10 posted on 09/28/2009 4:49:44 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson