Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/28/2009 7:54:27 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SmithL

3 deaths in one year? Aren’t there bigger problems?


2 posted on 09/28/2009 7:58:42 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Studies by the CHP have shown that splitting lanes is safer than sitting in traffic


3 posted on 09/28/2009 8:00:19 AM PDT by clamper1797 (If Obama were a paid Soviet agent he could not do more damage ... Sen Thomas Jordan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

In Illinois a motorcycle can only split a lane with another motorcycle. It cannot ride alongside of any other kind of vehicle, nor may it pass any other kind of vehicle in the same lane. I’m quite surprised that it’s apparently legal elsewhere.


4 posted on 09/28/2009 8:03:26 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Legal or not, “lane splitting” on a motorcycle is utterly stupid IMHO. You have essentially reduced your margin of safety to zero.
That being said, I would oppose any laws against this dumb maneuver. Let these people have their freedom to risk their lives in any way they wish, just don’t expect me to pay the financial costs of their actions. But that’s just the libertarian in me coming out.


5 posted on 09/28/2009 8:04:09 AM PDT by SkiKnee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
In low speed bumper to bumper traffic as that photo suggests, I'd say it's much safer for the biker to slide in between a couple of cars just as a protective strategy as opposed to taking a rear ender that could be fatal to him. Rear enders nearly always happen at lights or in jams when someone behind is not paying attention.

At highway speeds, I'd say getting between two cars is foolish at best. If someone swerves, you have no escape route.

6 posted on 09/28/2009 8:04:34 AM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

In other words, in all cases, the rider was doing something unwise, or otherwise not being careful (riding too fast, splitting in an area where lanes are narrow, etc). And the dangers, apart from not riding carefully, are primarily aggressive car drivers (opening doors or deliberately riding the line to block lane splitters). If done properly (traffic below 35mph, wide lanes) and the rider exercises due care, lane splitting is no more dangerous than riding anywhere else. The subtext on this reads more like a cage-driver being jealous of the lane-splitting bikers, and trying to turn the public against the practice by highlighting accidents that could have happened in any situation, but happened to occur in conjunction with lane-splitting (like going after video games because some disaffected teen who offed a bunch of people also happened to play games).


7 posted on 09/28/2009 8:05:08 AM PDT by Little Pig (Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

These guys are mere amateurs, as anyone who has driven through Paris at rush-hour can attest. Maybe the problem is there aren’t enough burning cars to light your way! ;-)


8 posted on 09/28/2009 8:05:26 AM PDT by Jagman (They comport, We deride!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
Camilli asks that drivers see motorcycles not as a dangerous nuisance, but as a green, fuel-efficient alternative to cars.

If they were actually interested in driving a "a green, fuel-efficient alternative to cars" they'd consider driving a much safer trike vehicle.
But then...they couldn't engage in their beloved lane-splitting. So, to me, it seems the green thing is a fallacious argument.

14 posted on 09/28/2009 8:15:51 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

If it hurts when you do that, don’t do that.


17 posted on 09/28/2009 8:17:24 AM PDT by Deaf Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

riding alongside other vehicles, between lanes..

Are they insane?

=Disaster b.c. when I am in a lane on the interstate or state HWY I do not expect for another vehicle to come up beside me (In my own lane!). THIS is dangerous: To all you motorcycle riders: Is your life really worth 5 extra minutes..!


18 posted on 09/28/2009 8:17:50 AM PDT by JSDude1 (www.wethepeopleindiana.org (Tea Party Member-Proud), www.travishankins.com (R- IN 09 2010!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

I hate splitting lanes, but when you are stuck in a traffic jam, especially in the heat, and you see that wide open zone between cars, its hard to resist.


27 posted on 09/28/2009 8:41:53 AM PDT by HerrBlucher (Obamanos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

I lived in California about 18 years ago and I was really surprised that this was legal. We would be riding along at 20 mph in a freeway traffic jam and suddenly a biker would whiz by between rows of traffic, only inches from the car. I saw one biker get really angry because a woman hadn’t left enough room for him to squeeze between her and the car in the other lane and he started beating on her trunk lid.


38 posted on 09/28/2009 9:38:37 AM PDT by mbynack (Retired USAF SMSgt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson