Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Hegewisch Dupa

The problem, is the league isn’t a collective. They have limited revenue sharing, but since the revenue is distributed unevenly, they have to force the players into a collective in order to control costs. If the league shared revenue, and required player salaries to be paid out of that revenue, then there would be no need to impose salary caps.


91 posted on 09/24/2009 4:52:17 AM PDT by NavVet ("You Lie!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: NavVet

For all intents and purposes the player salaries are paid out of the shared revenue. If you take the total amount of the TV contracts (shared revenue) and divide by 32 (number of teams) you get a number that’s right in the ball park of the cap. And that doesn’t even count the visiting ticket gate and a few other revenue streams that are shared.


97 posted on 09/24/2009 11:16:23 AM PDT by discostu (When I'm walking a dark road I am a man who walks alone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson