To: GovernmentShrinker
If the anti-Romney zealots dont start focusing on getting a really qualified and electable candidate lined up for 2012, theyll almost certainly find themselves facing a choice between Romney and Obama. And Palin is most certainly NOT qualified or electable.
She is emminently more qualified than any of the posers on the stage right now.
She's a fighter, which they are not.
She's a libertarian Republican, which they are not.
She's absolutely pro-life, which she shares with most of the rest.
She's been a successful Governor.
I wonder, what is your list of qualifications that she does not measure up to?
If I remember right, you are a serial anti-Palin poster who can never prove the point that she is unqualified.
Lot's of smoke, no fire!
To: SoConPubbie; GovernmentShrinker
38 posted on
09/22/2009 10:07:43 PM PDT by
rabscuttle385
(So many Communists, so little time.)
To: SoConPubbie
“She’s been a successful Governor. “
Come on, she didn’t even finish one term. I had a problem with romney, that he only had one term and didn’t bother facing re-election (probably because he knew he couldn’t win). But even that is more than Palin. It’s a big problem for her.
42 posted on
09/22/2009 10:23:35 PM PDT by
ari-freedom
(Fiscal conservatism without social conservatism is dead.)
To: SoConPubbie
Agree 100 percent Sarah is IMO the only one qualified shy of maybe Bobby J.
This Mitt is a McCain rerun folks.
Why all the sudden is one Governor with an established record less qualified than another ?
Lame excuse by the Mitt camp. Real lame BS excuse.
SARAH 2012 !
63 posted on
09/23/2009 2:24:28 AM PDT by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson