If the anti-Romney zealots don’t start focusing on getting a really qualified and electable candidate lined up for 2012, they’ll almost certainly find themselves facing a choice between Romney and Obama. And Palin is most certainly NOT qualified or electable.
If obama is qualified and electable than palin has more than meet that very low benchmark
Hello? That sentence is more aptly directed at Romney zealots.
I love and respect Mark Levin; I remember the early days of the primaries when he referred to Fred Thompson as "my guy." He did not like Romney, and when Romney zealots attempt to twist Levin's reluctant endorsement as high praise, Levin should call bull on it. I'm sad that he won't call a spade a spade and Romney a big government elitist controller, because that's what Romney is.
In the short run, McCain and Romney would have been less disruptive ... but in their potential, and the potential of any big government "moderate" Republican for long-term damage to the future hope for America, they pose a bigger danger than Obama. THEY are the problem, and clothespin-voting is why they're the problem. I have done enough clothes-pin voting now to have finally figured out that it is engaging in Einstein's definition of insanity.
I will apply what I've learned and when Romney zealots focus on getting big-government politicians in office, I will VOTE AGAINST THEM. And I will be joined by millions of Republicans and conservatives who want a party that stands for GETTING GOVERNMENT OUT OF OUR HAIR. Romney is demonstrably a proponent of bigger government and more government authority over our lives. He deserves to be rejected. He is a loser for the GOP, and he represents WHY the GOP is so weak that few are rallying behind it as it stands now.
People will rally behind the GOP when its big-government politicians like Mitt are tossed to the curb and the GOP motto is: Getting government out of your hair, off your neck, and back in the servants' quarters where it belongs.