Posted on 09/21/2009 8:17:29 AM PDT by opentalk
“It comes down to the most fundamental of all freedoms. If government can force potentially dangerous substances into our bodies what, then, can’t government do to us?” asked Constitution Party National Committee Chairman Jim Clymer.
“Whether mandated by the federal government, the individual states such as Massachusetts or international organizations like the World Health Organization WHO) or the United Nations U.N.) forcing potentially dangerous chemicals on a free people is tyranny”, Clymer added.
(Excerpt) Read more at constitutionparty.com ...
Just shoot back...
our military men and women should NOT be used as guinea pigs for the health care industry. That has NOTHING to do with protecting us. Our soldiers have been misused and mistreated by the US gov’t for many years.. some signed up to serve their country, and some signed up to get experience and education... that doesn’t mean they can be used and abused and then thrown away and forgotten.
Recall that our FDA banned thalidomide while other countries did not. I’m not on either side here, still reading and learning, but just saying . . . The armless babies were elsewhere.
true... but that was the OLD FDA, not today’s “more enlightened” FDA that pushed out nutrasweet, BGH, prosac, etc
keep in mind, thalidomide WAS peer approved in other countries... like peer-approved means anything anymore (re: global-cooling / global-warming)
“You had better be nice to me, or I’ll sneak up behind you and vaccinate you.”
You try that and you might find yourself vaccinated with a 45 caliber sized needle...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.