Do you expect the American Public to believe that if Obama decided to fully release his original vital records and he called up the HI vital records department and requested certified photocopies of his original 1961 birth documents (hospital BC, report of home birth, BC modified in adoption, whatever) that HI would then tell Obama “Sorry Mr. President, but we can only give you a certification on a summary short form printout from our database.”
How credible is that?
How long would it take the White House lawyers to extract a certified copy of the records from HI if Obama actually decided to provide the transparency he promised?
“But HI only gives out a short form now.” If the president asks for one???
Give me a break!
It occurred to me last night, that Obamas sister was born in Indonesia, yet has a hawaiian birth certificate. Yet, is she a US Citizen? No, why is that?
It makes sense that this is a pattern. Obama was not born in the US, I believe in Kenya, and has a Hawaiian birth certificate as well. Yet he is claiming to be a US Citizen.
They did this on purpose. Hawaii took COLB’s for many reasons in 1961 thru 1972, when they changed the law.
Many people who were not born in the US took advantage of this for US Citizenship, and it has only been brought to light with the Presidents birth records.
By showing his birth certificate, he opens investigations, not only into his background, but his sisters, and many others who may not be Natural Born Citizens that became so thru this loophole. Who know who may be involved, and who might be in jobs they are not qualified to have.
Just another piece of the puzzle.
I don’t doubt that Hawaii could produce the “vital” records, but can you still get a photo copy of your original birth certificate?
This is such a basic, essential question, yet I can’t seem to find the answer. Certainly someone has looked into this?