But it still pertains to his duties as president. And as such, the Justice Department provides the defense.
Suppose an individual were to be an Impostor, posing as Pres. BO, having knocked off the Original. If someone discovered that and sought to have the court remove the Impostor from office, would you expect DOJ to defend him? This is no different, IMO.
Until the impostor is proven to be the impostor then he/she is presumed to be president.
You wrote... Until the impostor is proven to be the impostor then he/she is presumed to be president.
- - -
As you very well know, that has already been proven and ironically by the imposter himself when he publicly announced to the world that he’s not a natural born citizen but rather a native citizen with allegiances and loyalties to the foreign governments of Great Britain and Kenya.
Your last statement there illustrates the fact that this whole birth certificate issue is turning out to be a great example of what happens when common sense clashes with its opposite.
The opposite of common sense can be labeled politithink, bureaucracythink, political correctthink or some other similar name. You know what it is when you see it.
The fatal error of this mindset is that it presumes man to be omnipotent creator. And when particular men try to use the language of man in creating their own reality (like Obama has done with his BC), the whole thing eventually comes tumbling down.
NS wrote: “But it still pertains to his duties as president. And as such, the Justice Department provides the defense.”
If what you say is true, NS, then why has the DOJ waited until NOW, to even COMMENT on these cases, and why is he STILL paying PRIVATE attorneys to appear on his behalf???
Clearly, if this were the case - the DOJ needing to represent him due to his being President - wouldn’t his PERSONAL & PRIVATE attorneys been taken OFF the cases after Jan. 20th, and the DOJ stepped in then? Would they not have been involved in every case that has come to court between the 20th of January, and today if that were the case?
Why did they wait 8 months to even COMMENT, and they have NOT sent attorneys on record for the defense from the DOJ to argue ANYTHING in ANY of these trials up until this motion.
Why did Obama spend over $1 million dollars to PRIVATE attorneys to fight these court cases if the DOJ was supposed to defend him on our dime? Makes no sense at all — especially for a Democrat — to NOT take advantage of taxpayer-paid lawyers, especially if by LAW it is their DUTY to do so (as you maintain).
Clearly, to me at least, something has changed now - in the last week or so - for the DOJ to step in at this point. What has changed? Orly just submitted a purportedly verified copy of a Kenyan BC for Obama, plus an affidavit regarding how it was obtained... And now all of a sudden the DOJ is involved and files a motion to dismiss? Seems awful coincidental, does it not?
Looking forward to your answers to these questions I have posed to you, NS.