Why is the DOJ weighing in on this so called “non issue”?
probably because it has merit
Because since they're suing the president, the U.S. Attorney handles the defense.
They have no standing (except posibly as "friend of the court")
Because it isn’t a not-issue, it is the 800 pound gorilla in the room that no one wants to talk about. Obama the Kenyan’s whole manufacdured, false, lying past is in the process of being brought kicking and screaming into the light of day. NO ONE SPENDS OVER ONE MILLION, FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS IN LEGAL FEES IN ORDER TO KEEP A LAWFULLY NOTERIZED $15 COPY OF A LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE FROM BEING SEEN BY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE UNLESS THERE IS SOMETHING VERY DAMNING IN THE DOCUMENT!
Why is the DOJ weighing in on this so called “non issue”?
I'm guessing it's because they want to live?
” The DOJ argues that they were not directly aggrieved by Obama’s election because they never had a mathematical chance of winning.”
This kind of sounds like they’re either grasping at straws or think a simple rebuttle is all they need to get it thrown out. They put as much language in there as possuble..and hope that something will avoid proving citizenship. (Which is baffling)
Oops
rebuttle = rebuttal
Daah....I wonder./sar