Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Daily Kos Has Nothing About Van Jones Controversy. Kinda Funny, Eh?
Kossacks ^ | 9-4-09 | Joinedafterattack

Posted on 09/04/2009 11:35:00 PM PDT by joinedafterattack

Daily Kos has it head in the sand trying to ignore the Van Jones Controversy. I guess if they pretend there is no Van Jones Controversy then it will go away. Very funny.

(Excerpt) Read more at 74.125.155.132 ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: dailykos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Daily Kos has it head in the sand trying to ignore the Van Jones Controversy. I guess if they pretend there is no Van Jones Controversy then it will go away. Very funny.
1 posted on 09/04/2009 11:35:03 PM PDT by joinedafterattack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack
Libs like when Jones says republicans are a**holes and lick their crack-pipes wanting a little bit more... just a little bit more.
2 posted on 09/04/2009 11:37:54 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper (Kennedy complained at 2:55 am to the hotel owner that he had been awoken by a noisy party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

Silence speaks volumes.


3 posted on 09/04/2009 11:40:54 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Where's this tagline thing everyone keeps talking about?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

Daily Kos is dying. It has lost over half it’s readership in the last year. A year ago it had 500,000 more visitors that FR, now it has 400,000 less.


4 posted on 09/04/2009 11:42:04 PM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
Daily Kos is dying. It has lost over half it’s readership in the last year. A year ago it had 500,000 more visitors that FR, now it has 400,000 less.

It met it's stated purpose last year.

5 posted on 09/04/2009 11:45:32 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper ("The Community Organizer better stop bitching that the community is organizing." - Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack
I guess if they pretend there is no Van Jones Controversy then it will go away.

And right they are. Jones will be gone by the end of next week, and the controversy (such as it is) will be gone.

We're going to hear about Bush/Cheney/Haliburton/No WMD/Abu Graib/Gitmo/waterboarding/CIA torture/etc., until the day we die.

But never again a peep about Van Jones after next week.

6 posted on 09/04/2009 11:45:51 PM PDT by kevao (DISSENT: It's no longer patriotic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

The little kossaks would be the first to go, if Obama and his homies really got control of this country.

More and more, the useful idiots are finding out what hardened racists Obama and his ilk are.

Must take a LOT of dope and alcohol to drown out that knowledge and keep believing in “Change”.


7 posted on 09/04/2009 11:47:12 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

But HuffPo is still growing by leaps and bounds while Daily Kos rots away.


8 posted on 09/04/2009 11:47:48 PM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

What is controversial about Jones from a Kos perspective? They agree with him.


9 posted on 09/04/2009 11:48:21 PM PDT by donmeaker (Invicto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
Daily Kos is dying. It has lost over half it’s readership in the last year. A year ago it had 500,000 more visitors than FR, now it has 400,000 less.

Wow. Now that is a very telling stat. Encouraging, as well.

10 posted on 09/04/2009 11:50:24 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack; All; Spunky; ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1035rep; 2ndDivisionVet; 4woodenboats; 5Madman2; ...

Finally I cannot resist sharing this about Daily Kos:

The word “kos” in Persian/Farsi has exactly the same prejorative meaning as a woman’s private part referred to as “c*nt” when used in English so Daily Kos is Daily C*nt every time I see it mentioned and gives me a chuckle, which now you can have, too.


11 posted on 09/04/2009 11:54:27 PM PDT by FARS ( Be happy, Be well)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FARS

that’t funny


12 posted on 09/04/2009 11:56:07 PM PDT by joinedafterattack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

True. I think HuffPo benefited from the rotting away of Dkos.


13 posted on 09/04/2009 11:57:16 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper ("The Community Organizer better stop bitching that the community is organizing." - Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

HAHA Roaches hate light.


14 posted on 09/04/2009 11:58:44 PM PDT by Danae (- Conservative does not equal Republican. Conservative does not compromise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

Exactly right! The only controversy is that we neanderthal, knuckle dragging, mouth breathing, inbred conservatives don’t like his enlightened, wise positions.

There’s nothing wrong with Van Jones; there is something wrong with us! At least that’s how the Kos Kid will think...


15 posted on 09/04/2009 11:59:20 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the Defense of the Indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Perhaps why, but only perhaps.

If one goes to the following link you can participate in the poll found below... or not.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/9/5/777313/-Will-I-Be-Banned-for-Defending-Van-Jones

Will I Be Banned for Defending Van Jones?
by pragprogress
Digg this! Share this on Twitter - Will I Be Banned for Defending Van Jones?Tweet this submit to reddit Share This
Fri Sep 04, 2009 at 10:20:10 PM PDT

Recently, White House Green Jobs Czar Anthony “Van” Jones has come under fire from Glenn Beck and others for signing a 2004 911Truth.org petition calling for an inquiry into “evidence that suggests high-level government officials may have deliberately allowed the September 11th attacks to occur”.

This raises an obvious question for us here at Daily Kos: can we defend Van Jones without running afoul of the Daily Kos ban on 9/11 CT? Here’s the text of the ban from the FAQ:

DailyKos accepts that the 9/11 attacks were perpetrated by agents of Al-Qaeda. It is forbidden to write diaries that:

refer to claims that American, British, Israeli, or any government assisted in the attacks

refer to claims that the airplanes that crashed into the WTC and Pentagon were not the cause of the damage to those buildings or their subsequent collapse.

Authoring or recommending these diaries may result in banning from Daily Kos.

* pragprogress’s diary :: ::
*

Van Jones is IMHO the most exciting Obama Administration appointment so far, in terms of both the person himself, and the position to which he was appointed. He’s a committed and effective progressive activist, a great writer and speaker, and has his finger on the pulse of where things need to go. “Green Jobs” is also the imperative of the day — this is something that can provide hope to the tens of millions of people without jobs right now, address the global warming crisis and lay the foundation for a new economy based on energy efficiency and independence.

[edit: transcript of original statement deleted]

I’m not going to mount a defense for the statement here, but I think it should be at least an open question as to whether that statement is such an unforgivable sin that it can’t even be defended here at Daily Kos.

Can we consider at the least a temporary lifting on the 9/11 CT ban at least for the duration of this controversy? Should we reconsider the ban on CT now that we are keenly aware of just how far the right is willing to go to destroy a Democratic President?

Again, Van Jones is one of our brightest lights, and his position is so key right now — what could be more important than building a new green economy that can bring us good jobs, environmental healing, and energy independence. Shouldn’t we be able to give him a full-throated defense, no?
Poll

Van Jones
Valuable Part of the Obama Administration
47% 25 votes
Under the Bus He Goes . . .
53% 28 votes

| 53 votes


16 posted on 09/05/2009 12:08:03 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

they’re coming up with a defence and once they got their talking points ready, the media will start reporting on it using the material from kos


17 posted on 09/05/2009 12:15:21 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FARS

LOL How fitting.


18 posted on 09/05/2009 12:16:51 AM PDT by TigersEye (0bama: "I can see Mecca from the WH portico." --- Google - Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FARS

Fars

I now have a warm and fuzzy feeling about that website


19 posted on 09/05/2009 12:23:01 AM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: joinedafterattack

Sign up over there and start a Van Jones thread.


20 posted on 09/05/2009 3:50:48 AM PDT by saganite (What would Sully do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson