I will always accept truth based on facts.
However, my money is on Mr. Smith submitting a false affidavit and a forged document to a Federal Court.
And that means prison time for Mr. Smith and disbarment for his attorney.
We will see...
Meanwhile...
The justice dept is running scared, this just in:
In a motion filed Friday in U.S. District Court in Santa Ana, Calif., government lawyers did not directly rebut the conspiracy theory Taitz propounds that Obama was not born in Hawaii as he claims and as asserted by Hawaiian officials as well as contemporary newspaper birth notices. Instead, the federal attorneys argued that the suit is inherently flawed because such disputes can’t be resolved in court and because the dozens of plaintiffs can’t show they are directly injured by Obama’s presence in office.
“It is clear, from the text of the Constitution, and the relevant statutory law implementing the Constitution’s textual commitments, that challenges to the qualifications of a candidate for President can, in the first instance, be presented to the voting public before the election, and, once the election is over, can be raised as objections as the electoral votes are counted in the Congress,” Assistant United States Attorneys Roger West and David DeJute wrote. “Therefore, challenges such as those purportedly raised in this case are committed, under the Constitution, to the electors, and to the Legislative branch.”
The birthers’ suit claims that Obama is a citizen of Indonesia and “possibly still citizen of Kenya, usurping the position of the President of the United States of America and the Commander-in-Chief.”
Lieutenant Jason Freese and some other plaintiffs in the case claim they have a real injury because they are serving in the military commander by Obama, the alleged usurper. However, West and DeJute say that argument is too speculative.
“The injuries alleged by Plaintiff Freese and the other military Plaintiffs herein, are not particularized as to them, but, rather, would be shared by all members of the military and is an inadequate basis on which to establish standing,” the government lawyers wrote.
Another plaintiff in the suit, Alan Keyes, is a three-time, longshot presidential candidate who ran most recently in 2008. Yet another is Gail Lightfoot, an ultra-longshot vice presidential candidate in 2008. The DOJ argues that they were not directly aggrieved by Obama’s election because they never had a mathematical chance of winning.
You've been defending Obama on nearly every birth certificate thread since before the election without the slightest trace of "facts" or "truth" to back your contentions.
No, Truman. You'll accept flimsy circumstantial evidence, convoluted deduction, and outright forgeries, per my observation.
The actual truth of this case has never been uncovered, because Obama and his lawyers have successfully kept it under wraps. We Birthers admit that, but you claim to know the truth of this issue without having the evidence.
When the truth of this sordid affair finally does come out, only then will we know if you'll "accept" it.