Corsis debunk point #8 that baby footprints weren’t on Kenyan BCs in the early 1960s is refuted by Dr. Ang’awas
use of such footprints in his publication. Corsis claim that Smith’s BC doesn’t look like their other Kenyan BCs is
easily refuted because Kenya Colony BCs Kenya outside the coastal strip leased from Zanzibar) wouldn’t necessarily look
like Mombasa Protectorate of Kenya BCs. NWD made the same silly claim about Taitzs 1964 certification compared to 1961
Kenya Colony BCs. Very sloppy on WWDs part.
I have hopes for Orly’s BC...
I dont know about Smith’s
NWD? WWD? You’re getting closer! ;-)