Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IIS bug gives attackers complete server control
The Register ^

Posted on 08/31/2009 6:36:55 PM PDT by Gomez

A hacker has uncovered a previously unknown bug in Microsoft's Internet Information Services webserver that in some cases gives attackers complete control of vulnerable machines.

Proof-of-concept code published Monday has been confirmed to give remote root access to servers running version 5 of IIS on Windows 2000 with Service Pack 4. And according to Nikolaos Rangos, the hacker who released the exploit, IIS6 is also vulnerable, even when a memory stack mechanism known as cookie protection is enabled.

The vulnerability appears to be triggered only in limited circumstances, specifically when IIS is set to enable the file transfer protocol and there is a writable folder. While that suggests the majority of IIS installations aren't vulnerable, the universe of affected systems is still big enough to give the security conscious pause.

"I have customers who have Windows 2000 servers and I scold them frequently." said Rodney Thayer, CTO of security research firm Secorix. "I think that's pretty bad, because if Microsoft says it's end of life and they're claiming it's not supported, then you shouldn't be running any software that the vendor says is not supported."

According to Microsoft's website here, mainstream support for IIS5 expired in 2005, but extended support remains in effect until July 2010. Support for Windows 2000 SP4 ends "24 months after the next service pack releases or at the end of the product's support lifecycle, whichever comes first," according to this page.

A Microsoft spokeswoman said company researchers are looking in to the report and will issue a public statement when they're finished. There are no reports of any such vulnerabilities being exploited in the wild, she added.

In May, Rangos disclosed another serious bug in IIS that left the popular web server vulnerable to a simple attack that exposed password-protected files and folders. Microsoft has since fixed it.

The claim of a bug in IIS is just one of three security advisories that greeted IT professionals on Monday morning. A separate vulnerability affecting a wide range of Linux kernels allows unprivileged local users to read parts of kernel memory that may contain sensitive information. While problematic, the bug - unlike like a critical NULL pointer dereference flaw published two weeks ago - doesn't directly lead to privilege escalation.

The hole has been plugged in Linux 2.6.31-rc7, but there appears to be no fix in the more stable 2.6.30.x series yet, Jon Oberheide, the security researcher who published Monday's disclosure, told The Register.

A third vulnerability disclosed Monday affects Google's Chrome browser and could be used in some cases by malicious websites to track web users. More about the bug is available here (PDF).


TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: malware

1 posted on 08/31/2009 6:36:55 PM PDT by Gomez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

ping


2 posted on 08/31/2009 6:37:48 PM PDT by Gomez (killer of threads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gomez

IIS 5 is ancient. IIS 6-7 have been rock solid for years now. Granted, a lot of sites still use 5.


3 posted on 08/31/2009 6:45:45 PM PDT by Fingolfin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gomez

Well, such is the risk of running a ten year old platform.

I doubt anyone that cared about security would run an old *nix distro either.


4 posted on 08/31/2009 6:46:32 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nnn0jeh

ping


5 posted on 08/31/2009 6:47:24 PM PDT by kalee (01/20/13 The end of an error.... Obama even worse than Carter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gomez

I wonder how many years it’s been since they found a security flaw in OpenVMS.


6 posted on 08/31/2009 7:44:23 PM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp

I wondered why they would even bother looking for holes. I keep hearing that hackers ignore platforms with small market shares.


7 posted on 08/31/2009 7:55:44 PM PDT by Gomez (killer of threads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

8 posted on 09/01/2009 5:16:18 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fingolfin
IIS 5 is ancient. IIS 6-7 have been rock solid for years now. Granted, a lot of sites still use 5.

From the article...

...IIS6 is also vulnerable, even when a memory stack mechanism known as cookie protection is enabled.

9 posted on 09/01/2009 6:52:06 AM PDT by Egon (The difference between Theory and Practice: In Theory, there is no difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gomez

Oh come on. Yes, IIS 5 installations are still out there, but mainstream support ended four years ago, and extended support (security hotfixes only) ends next year. Anybody still on IIS 5 is pushing it already.


10 posted on 09/01/2009 7:35:42 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson