Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jaycee Dugard's prison: 1st pictures of filthy backyard jail where religious fanatic held girl
Mail Online ^ | 8-30-09 | Sharon Churcher & Peter Sheridan

Posted on 08/30/2009 10:15:58 AM PDT by blueglass

These extraordinary pictures are the first glimpse inside the squalid back garden compound where Jaycee Lee Dugard was kept captive for 18 years. A hand-painted 'Welcome' sign leads the way to a rundown world of tattered tents and outbuildings amid overgrown trees and bushes.The first words Jaycee said to her mother when the pair were tearfully reunited were: 'Hi Mom, I have babies,' it has emerged.

The 29-year-old's stepfather also claims that she had developed a powerful emotional bond with her abductor, Phillip Garrido.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: crime; cult; dugard; stockholmsyndrome
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: Kirkwood
From what I can gather, he is a religious fanatic.

Any particular religion?

41 posted on 08/30/2009 11:25:45 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary,conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN
A neighbour said he saw men lining up in Garrido's garden, before entering the tents 'one by one'. Mike Rogers, 49, told the newspaper that he once peered through the garden fence during an 'excessively loud' party next door.

'What I saw was not normal,' he said. 'Eight to 10 men, mostly Mexican, would gather in a line in his garden drinking beer, yelling and screaming and swearing.

'They normally had a bonfire and I saw them entering the tent one by one. On a number of occasions I saw them bobbing up and down through the window and I thought, 'My God, there is something sexual going on in there'."

So my question is WHEN did he see this all take place? And it wasn't just ONCE the neighbor saw them from his own testiment.

And so it would appear that it's possible this Monster didn't father her two children. A DNA test should be done.

sw

42 posted on 08/30/2009 11:35:11 AM PDT by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN
"I have not heard that there were “lines of men going into tents”.

Also, the police were called, they did nothing."

The neighbors who witnessed this did not call the police. They decided not to get involved.

43 posted on 08/30/2009 11:36:16 AM PDT by LADY J (Change your thoughts and you change your world. - Norman Vincent Peale)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: LADY J
Right..they didn't call the police.

sw

44 posted on 08/30/2009 11:37:05 AM PDT by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
The evidence points toward him practicing the Islamic "religion", normally. ...As you can see, "religion" doesn't necessarily mean there needs to be a "god" of any kind involved. Atheism for example is a kind of religion

I don't have enough info. Perhaps if we had some of his tracts.

"Her captor claimed to be a minister of a 'church' he called God's Desire and indoctrinated her with self-published religious tracts."

45 posted on 08/30/2009 11:40:42 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle
He was caught because a cop on some campus became suspicous when the perv was handing out religious tracts. "He is a religious nut who was trying to start his own church.

Scientologists hand out 'religious tracts' as well. But it has nothing to do at all with the God of Abraham and any of Jewish-Christian scripture.
It fact why they refer to their club houses as "churches" doesn't make any sense either. Jews don't call their synagogues "churches", Muslims call their places of worship "Mosks', Buddhists call theirs "temples", as do Hindus.

So I'd say this guy was trying to start his own cult, not a church.

Church: A building set apart for Christian worship.

A Church: Characterized by an episcopal hierarchy with the pope as its head and belief in seven sacraments and the authority of tradition.

46 posted on 08/30/2009 11:44:50 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
Be careful. You might be implicitly defining yourself as a religious fanatic.

Nonsense aside, I made the statement that this guy most definately wasn't an orthodox, biblical Christian in any sense of the word. You then asked me if I doubted that he was a "religious nut", which seems to imply that you mentally associate "Christian" with "religious nut."

If this is not the case, then just say so. If this is the case, then you obviously forgot to take your smart pills this morning.

47 posted on 08/30/2009 11:44:55 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
A Church: Characterized by an episcopal hierarchy with the pope as its head and belief in seven sacraments and the authority of tradition.

Um....no.

48 posted on 08/30/2009 11:45:45 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
""Her captor claimed to be a minister of a 'church' he called God's Desire and indoctrinated her with self-published religious tracts."

Again, this is media leading the reader to think he was some kind of Christian, which clearly he isn't. "He saw himself as the head of a religious cult, which he based on self published doctrine". would have been the proper way to word it.

49 posted on 08/30/2009 11:52:27 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
"I don't have enough info. Perhaps if we had some of his tracts."

He has a page/kind of blog with all his garbage, but I misplaced the URL.

Maybe another FReeper has it?

50 posted on 08/30/2009 11:53:39 AM PDT by LADY J (Change your thoughts and you change your world. - Norman Vincent Peale)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
To the modern British press, anyone who has any religious faith at all is a religious fanatic. Insanity is simply corroborating evidence to a British secularist. It galls me to see how Britain's people are complacent when there is a righteous God Who judges nations - usually by letting them be themselves.

Would that there be a revival of true saving faith in Britain. Would that there be raised new Wesleys, new Chestertons, new Newtons, new Booths, to save this distressed nation.

51 posted on 08/30/2009 11:53:53 AM PDT by GAB-1955 (I write books, love my wife, serve my nation, and believe in the Resurrection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Nonsense aside, I made the statement that this guy most definately wasn't an orthodox, biblical Christian in any sense of the word. You then asked me if I doubted that he was a "religious nut", which seems to imply that you mentally associate "Christian" with "religious nut."

You did agree that he was a religious nut.

52 posted on 08/30/2009 11:54:11 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Umm no? Are you saying The Roman Catholic Church has it's own definitions wrong?

http://www.answers.com/topic/roman-catholic-church

n.

The Christian church characterized by an episcopal hierarchy with the pope as its head and belief in seven sacraments and the authority of tradition.

53 posted on 08/30/2009 11:54:38 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: spectre

I used to live in Antioch, and the area where this happened is really bad. Run down, outskirts of town. I can see the people there not calling police. They probably didn’t want police anywhere near there...


54 posted on 08/30/2009 11:55:31 AM PDT by sissyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

Of course, but that still doesn’t mean he wasn’t a religious nutcase. Do YOU think his religion was mainstream?


55 posted on 08/30/2009 11:56:46 AM PDT by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

his “ religion” was nothing CLOSE to Christian!!


56 posted on 08/30/2009 11:57:01 AM PDT by pollywog (Psalm 91:4 ...staying cuddled Under His Wings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
Again, this is media leading the reader to think he was some kind of Christian, which clearly he isn't. "He saw himself as the head of a religious cult, which he based on self published doctrine". would have been the proper way to word it.

Actually, I think they were pretty neutral. Only pointing out what he claimed and putting church in ''s as to imply that it might NOT refer to a Christian church.

-------------------------------

"Her captor claimed to be a minister of a 'church' he called God's Desire and indoctrinated her with self-published religious tracts.

57 posted on 08/30/2009 11:57:11 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude

He should be strung up by his testicles until he dies of dehydration.


58 posted on 08/30/2009 11:57:31 AM PDT by peeps36 (Democrats Don't Need No Stinking Input From You Little People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pollywog
his “ religion” was nothing CLOSE to Christian!!

Who said it was?

59 posted on 08/30/2009 11:58:32 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg

His own private one. Look around you. There are many religious nutcases in the world. Some go on to form cults and get others to drink the kool aid, while others practice their nutty religion in private.


60 posted on 08/30/2009 11:59:29 AM PDT by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson