1 posted on
08/28/2009 11:17:41 AM PDT by
kellynla
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: rolling_stone
2 posted on
08/28/2009 11:18:02 AM PDT by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
To: kellynla
they are citizens not natural born citizens, totally different.
To: kellynla
If they are citizens - yes. (Although, being a citizen doesn’t seem to matter any longer.)
4 posted on
08/28/2009 11:18:50 AM PDT by
svcw
(Legalism reinforces self-righteousness - it communicates to you the good news of your own goodness)
To: kellynla
Apparently ANYONE is eligible to be president at age 35.
5 posted on
08/28/2009 11:18:56 AM PDT by
WayneS
(Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
To: kellynla
If Obama is, then the answer is Yes, as he has never had to show his BC. So what is the point of having that as a rule?????
7 posted on
08/28/2009 11:19:42 AM PDT by
Red in Blue PA
(If guns cause crime, then all of mine are defective!)
To: kellynla
Since non-citizens are eligible, I don’t see why anchor babies aren’t.
To: kellynla
10 posted on
08/28/2009 11:20:34 AM PDT by
netmilsmom
(Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
To: kellynla
Yes. Under the current interpretation of citizenship law, they are natural born citizens.
11 posted on
08/28/2009 11:21:13 AM PDT by
B Knotts
(Calvin Coolidge Republican)
To: kellynla
12 posted on
08/28/2009 11:21:37 AM PDT by
Melas
To: kellynla
Clause 5. No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been Fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
13 posted on
08/28/2009 11:21:52 AM PDT by
svcw
(Legalism reinforces self-righteousness - it communicates to you the good news of your own goodness)
To: kellynla
Are you cracking wise, Kelly?
:^)
14 posted on
08/28/2009 11:22:05 AM PDT by
Cyber Liberty
(I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
To: kellynla
If things keep up the way they are going now, it won’t make any difference by then
15 posted on
08/28/2009 11:23:10 AM PDT by
SMARTY
("Stay together, pay the soldiers and forget everything else" Lucius Septimus Severus)
To: kellynla
"Are "anchor babies" eligible at 35 to be POTUS?" According to US v. Wong Kim Ark they are, especially if you read Fuller's dissent. Fuller laments the fact that, because of this majority's opinion, a child born to two US citizens outside the US would not be eligible to be President, but a child born to two non-Citizens on US soil, would be eligible to be President.
Pretty much sums it up.
16 posted on
08/28/2009 11:23:26 AM PDT by
OldDeckHand
(No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
To: kellynla
Yes, they are Natural Born Citizens. Hence the term “anchor baby.”
18 posted on
08/28/2009 11:25:34 AM PDT by
Drew68
To: kellynla
anchor baby = us citizen, red, white, & blue.
22 posted on
08/28/2009 11:28:04 AM PDT by
BGHater
(Insanity is voting for Republicans and expecting Conservatism.)
To: kellynla; MHGinTN
Big fat NO...
Theyre not natural born citizens...
To: kellynla
Luke ‘’The Drifter’’ says:
“We Americans got so tired of being thought of as dumbasses by the
rest of the world that we went to the polls last November and removed all doubt.”
28 posted on
08/28/2009 11:32:07 AM PDT by
rolling_stone
(no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
To: kellynla
Yes. They are natural-born, not naturalized.
To: kellynla
sigh,,,, anchor babies were outlawed by the 1996 immigration reform.
Custody follows the parents so when the illegal alien parents are deported the us citizen child goes with them but is able to return at 18. The children of that citizen are only citizens by birth IF the citizen has lived in the USA for 10 years continuously.
There are no more anchor babies under the law.
I think you must mean birthright citizenship.
35 posted on
08/28/2009 11:47:15 AM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: kellynla
It doesn’t seem to matter any more. If you think it does, then you are a right-wing radical kook. Lord forbid we respect the Constitution...
39 posted on
08/28/2009 12:05:10 PM PDT by
thecraw
(Christian by choice, American by the grace of God. Oh yeah, a Birther too!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson