To: nomad
he does make a valid point about the Republicratic push towards State-ismIt's true he had some points but he really lost me at running Ron Paul, among other things.
44 posted on
08/07/2009 3:51:09 PM PDT by
paulycy
(Screw the RACErs.)
To: paulycy
It's true he had some points but he really lost me at running Ron Paul, among other things. Look at the post as "Divide and Conquer" rhetoric. He offers up no solution.
![](http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b64/darkwing104/darkwing1.gif)
51 posted on
08/07/2009 3:54:09 PM PDT by
darkwing104
(Lets get dangerous)
To: paulycy
Agreed,but the Republicrats have been part of the problem,I don`t care what any Republicrat cool-aiders say.We need to AXE at least 90% of the present Federal bureaucracy.Until that happens,I don`t see the Republicrats as the solution,they`re part of the problem.
Prove me wrong,I TRIPPLE DOG DARE YOU!
56 posted on
08/07/2009 3:58:51 PM PDT by
nomad
To: paulycy; nomad
I really love all the dipsticks who complain about career politicians and then offer up Paul, who has approximately two decades in Washington and plays the game as well as any other denizen of the Potomac swamps.
Ron Paul is viable as a conservative presidential candidate in the same way that an anvil is a viable flotation device.
97 posted on
08/10/2009 4:57:52 PM PDT by
Mr. Silverback
(We're definitely in the Rise of the Empire era, but is Obama Valorum or Palpatine?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson