Replies

Actually, my original comment was:

OMG that Love’s Baby Soft ad! And the baby under the tub! WTH??

Then I commented to another poster regarding the ad about killing the women. But, hey, you find murder, pedophilia, and injured babies funny. To each their own.

But, hey, you find murder, pedophilia, and injured babies funny. To each their own.

So now you go from a lack of any sense of humor to personal attack accusing me of laughing at "pedophilia;" nice. How very Liberal-like of you.

Of course it just further proves how lacking you are of any sense of proportion. There is a difference between being hateful and being humorous...too bad the younger generations no longer comprehend that difference. Everything is personal to people like you.

Well wait. What's funny is the idea that some idiotic people would actually pay to print that stuff. The baby-soft ad is disgusting and repulsive and the blogger makes that clear.

It is funny in a grim way that the advertisers would think that it was a good idea in ANY day and age or that they would be able to move more product with it. In all likely hood I doubt they were TRYING to promote pedophilia (unless they had a thousand young girls chained in the basement whom they were trying to sell off as sex slaves). Their product was a sweet smelling girlie product and they were trying to compete with sexier and racier ads with more sophisticated perfumes and products from other companies. They wanted their clientelle to associate themselves with being feeling young. I would bet that the senior execs in the company were mortified when they saw the ad and realized the pedophilic imagery that it conjured.

I bet and hope someone got fired. So though disgusted by the presentation itself, I still find the idioticness of anyone putting it forward on purpose to be hilarious. (Repeat: pedophilia=”not funny”, idioticness=”funny”)