The
White House 'dialogue' site has to be scrubbed regularly because of long form birth certificate eligibility posts.
Rush Limbaugh joked several times on his radio show on 6/10/09: "What do God and Obama have in commen? (Answer) Neither have birth certificates."
Even
the liberal LA Times on June 30, 2009 in an article dripping with contempt--conceded that the thing Obama's people posted online was "technically... not a birth certificate".
A
bill in the US congress with 10 backers currently -- calls for future presidential candidates to be required to show a birth certificate.
The
library of congress has recently started including the Obama File in its historic collections of Internet materials related to the Presidential Transition during a Time of Crises.
The Obama File holds that Obama's birth certificate as presented online is bogus.
Now this story is starting to change. Some liberals in an open acknowledgement of Obama's problems are starting to call for a change in the constitution.
Liberal defenders of Obama in full retreat on Birth CertificateNow The
LA Times Wants To Amend the Constitution Rather Than Have Obama Show His Birth Certificate. (Translation: Yeah he’s not a Natural Born Citizen — As the Constitution Requires.)
It takes a supermajority in the Senate to pass such a Constitutional Amendment out of the Congress, and then it must be ratified by 75% of the States in a special National vote.
Not gonna happen. Not even a valid concern unless and until Zer0's ratbag buds over at APECORN take absolute control of our electoral process, like through some mechanism such as a census... uh.. er...
...Uh-oh!
We have every reason to be taking this deadly series... it's prolly hugh.
;-/