You said — No one has demonstrated that a violation of the constitution exists.
—
Yeah... a “little point” (or a major point... LOL...) that many seem to want to pretend doesn’t exists. Those of this persuasion seem to think that merely “thinking it” in their own heads is sufficient...
I gotta wonder if we’re talking about conservatives or liberals here... :-)
You are talking about logic. He never demonstrated that he met the constitutional requirements. Until he does, we must conclude that he does not. To do otherwise is illogical, dangerous, and risks supporting what may the largest fraud ever perpetrated on the US. If I’m wrong, I’m a fool. If you’re wrong, the entire country is in the hands of a usurper.