You are talking about logic. He never demonstrated that he met the constitutional requirements. Until he does, we must conclude that he does not. To do otherwise is illogical, dangerous, and risks supporting what may the largest fraud ever perpetrated on the US. If I’m wrong, I’m a fool. If you’re wrong, the entire country is in the hands of a usurper.
You said — He never demonstrated that he met the constitutional requirements. Until he does, we must conclude that he does not.
—
The trouble with that is that we’ve now got to conclude Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, and so on..., are/were not qualified — because none of them had produced their birth certificates when running for office, either... LOL...