Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mlo

If a president’s birthplace is known and there’s no issue over it, there’s no need to ask for irrefutable proof.

Once a “president” issues a fake document and claims it’s real, plus has trouble recalling which hospital was the location of his birth, there comes a need for irrefutable verification of the facts at hand.

I can prove to you where I was born and I can produce a copy of my actual birth certificate and I can prove to you that my parents are my parents and they are U.S. Citizens. 0bama can’t do that. There are too many problems in his story for anyone to take him at face value. That’s why he must be required to prove his eligibility.

And the question no one’s answered so far is: Why spend upwards of a million dollars to hide a document that only costs pocket money to produce and end this once and for all? That alone should be enough to make everyone doubt his natural born status.


142 posted on 07/22/2009 9:39:40 PM PDT by Two Kids' Dad (((( ))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: Two Kids' Dad

Here’s the real problem.

He should have been required to provide the necessary documentation before the election.


144 posted on 07/22/2009 9:45:40 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Where's this tagline thing everyone keeps talking about?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson