Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Star Traveler

You see..., you — yourself — also accepted other Presidential candidates in the past *on that very same basis* (their signed legal affirmations) without ever seeing their birth certificate. It’s nothing new, and it’s been done all the time, in the past.

It was not challenged at that time. It is being challenged now. The American people have a right to know if he is legitimate or not. He doesn’t have a legal right to keep it hidden now.


72 posted on 07/21/2009 4:27:23 PM PDT by Know et al (Everything I know I read in the newspaper and that's the reason for my ignorance: Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Know et al

You said — He doesn’t have a legal right to keep it hidden now.

Ummm..., I would say, yes, he does have a legal right to keep it hidden. To say it another way is to say, “There is no legal requirement for him to show it.”

That’s just the fact of the matter and that is what I call — “self-evident”.

It’s entirely self-evident that there is no legal requirement for Obama to show it — because if there were — all one would have to do is go to a judge, cite the law stating the legal requirement, and it would be ordered to show it...

Hence, it’s self-evident, there is no legal requirement for Obama to show it...


84 posted on 07/21/2009 4:32:25 PM PDT by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson