Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Know et al

You said — He doesn’t have a legal right to keep it hidden now.

Ummm..., I would say, yes, he does have a legal right to keep it hidden. To say it another way is to say, “There is no legal requirement for him to show it.”

That’s just the fact of the matter and that is what I call — “self-evident”.

It’s entirely self-evident that there is no legal requirement for Obama to show it — because if there were — all one would have to do is go to a judge, cite the law stating the legal requirement, and it would be ordered to show it...

Hence, it’s self-evident, there is no legal requirement for Obama to show it...


84 posted on 07/21/2009 4:32:25 PM PDT by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: Star Traveler

Then you are saying his right to keep it hidden, if there is a BC, supersedes the U. S. Constitution.


209 posted on 07/21/2009 6:11:04 PM PDT by Know et al (Everything I know I read in the newspaper and that's the reason for my ignorance: Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson