[MHGinTN]

[[ Monday's hearing was on a request by Taitz for a default judgment, since she notified the president of the action weeks ago, and his lawyers failed to respond. (The man was duly served back in January prior to his swearing in)

U.S. District Judge David O. Carter ruled in favor of Taitz and granted the "motion for reconsideration of order to show cause or in the alternative to certify question for appeal.". A trial date will be set and Taitz "will immediately request access to Obama's birth records and other documentation that could determine his eligibility to occupy the Oval Office." ]]

[Calpernia]

>>>>The man was duly served back in January prior to his swearing in

Actually, that isn't true. He was served February 10. The case was back dated.

Actual thread when service happened: White House Refused to be Served Pleadings

From the Docket:

05/18/2009: PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by plaintiffs upon Barack H Obama served on 2/10/2009, answer due 3/2/2009. The Summons and Complaint were served by substituted service, by not indicated statute, upon mail clerk at Department of Justice. Due Dilligence declaration none. Original Summons not returned. (twdb) (Entered: 05/19/2009)

The actual document: Obama v. Keyes It is dated at the bottom of this document as January 19.

Open it and look for yourself. Then check the document properties. It shows January 26th as the initial creation.

[real_patriotic_american]

Right on!

You wrote- “A trial date will be set and Taitz “will immediately request access to Obama’s birth records and other documentation that could determine his eligibility to occupy the Oval Office.””