Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor

LOL, yes. sorry.

Oh, nevermind now. When there was no ambiguity, I once wanted to make the same point you made today, but in a short discussion we had last month where I tried to aid you. I can see now that here you are being provided opportunities for snark here and that you are enjoying it. I don’t wish to intrude on your fun.

I tend to be a bit more serious. Given the nature of my ping list, you already know that. I’ve a few strengths, and although patience may be among them, I hate wasting what time I have left maneuvering in a field where snark is in the air. ;)

God willing, we’ll probably get to discuss it another time.


85 posted on 07/11/2009 6:54:20 PM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla (Yesterday's Left = today's status quo. Thus "CONSERVATIVE": a conflicted label for battling tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: Avoiding_Sulla

Thanks, ‘snark’ tends to be the essence of crevo threads, since the mods seem to lack the courage to zap the deliberate deceivers.


88 posted on 07/11/2009 8:21:56 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson