Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MAJOR STEFAN FREDERICK COOK v [et. al] (RE: Obama eligibility - Dr. Taitz)
7/10/2009 | rxsid

Posted on 07/10/2009 3:22:39 PM PDT by rxsid

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 381-400 next last
To: danamco
"She might be guilty too in the conspiracy by NOT vetting him properly??? That is the reason why this scam our nation has never experience before in history makes it a huge Constitutional crisis imaginable!!!"

Correct! She's knee deep in this herself:

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Certified Obama’s Nomination
"via Virgil, Count Us Out Reader I have a PDF sent from Virginia SOS that is signed by Nancy Pelosi that specifically states she certified OBAMA’s qualifications. This is important because if OBAMA is not qualified by pending lawsuits, she can be held responsible for fraud , high crimes and misdemeanors, and misrepresentation." http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1237

241 posted on 07/12/2009 2:13:15 PM PDT by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
Some of our members of the military are risking their careers to expose this fraud

And really, what are WE here at FR risking???

242 posted on 07/12/2009 2:15:06 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
And therein lies Obama's weakness. Any military officer who refuses orders from Obama should not fear Obama will seek court martial of the officer. Why? Because it opens him up to discovery for which he is afraid.

I feel this is the key to unravel the affirmative action's PINO and expose him as an illegal alien and the usurper in the White House. GO Orly and Cooper, GO!!!

243 posted on 07/12/2009 2:19:19 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: rxsid; danamco; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; BP2; ...

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Certified Obama’s Nomination

“via Virgil, Count Us Out Reader I have a PDF sent from Virginia SOS that is signed by Nancy Pelosi that specifically states she certified OBAMA’s qualifications.

This is important because if OBAMA is not qualified by pending lawsuits, she can be held responsible for fraud , high crimes and misdemeanors, and misrepresentation.”

http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1237

~~ Trying to keep up Ping ~~

(Thanks, danamco.)


244 posted on 07/12/2009 2:28:04 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: Osnome

No, most news outlet including Conservative hosts have been muzzled from higher ups!!!


245 posted on 07/12/2009 2:36:49 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw

Maybe this clarify how this is done???


246 posted on 07/12/2009 2:41:09 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; null and void; Beckwith; stockpirate; PhilDragoo; Candor7; MeekOneGOP; Myrddin; ...

Pelosi, acting on behalf of the DNC, certified that Obama and Biden were duly elected by the DNC as their official candidates for the national Presidential election, and that the DNC are now officialy committed to campaign for them.

HOWEVER, there is absolutely NOTHING in this that attests to any Constitutional qualifications to BE President.

Why in the world are we grasping at old straws?


247 posted on 07/12/2009 2:45:33 PM PDT by Polarik (Obama: When destroying America is not enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; null and void; Beckwith; stockpirate; PhilDragoo; Candor7; MeekOneGOP; Myrddin; ...

Pelosi, acting on behalf of the DNC, certified that Obama and Biden were duly elected by the DNC as their official candidates for the national Presidential election, and that the DNC are now officialy committed to campaign for them.

HOWEVER, there is absolutely NOTHING in this that attests to any Constitutional qualifications to BE President.

Why in the world are we grasping at old straws?


248 posted on 07/12/2009 2:47:23 PM PDT by Polarik (Obama: When destroying America is not enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Does that mean Bo, Bideb, Nanzi would all have to step down? Who’s next in line Bird.....Hillary....


249 posted on 07/12/2009 2:50:04 PM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: frog in a pot
officers intentionally says absolutely nothing about the President. The officers fealty is specifically to the U.S. Constitution.

Read from Orly's Application for Restraining Order. the oath is stated bottom of page 1:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/17266905/05311066823

250 posted on 07/12/2009 2:51:41 PM PDT by urtax$@work (The best kind of memorial is a Burning Memorial.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Utah Binger

ping for later


251 posted on 07/12/2009 2:53:06 PM PDT by Utah Binger (Mount Carmel Utah, In the Heart of Maynard Dixon Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: frog in a pot

You think maybe Orly messed up the pleading? Hers has
the enlisted version instead of the Officers version !?


252 posted on 07/12/2009 2:57:55 PM PDT by urtax$@work (The best kind of memorial is a Burning Memorial.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis
That does not make sense!!!

How can you sue for something before his nomination, huh???

253 posted on 07/12/2009 3:13:50 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: urtax$@work

“…the oath is stated bottom of page 1:”

It would be more accurate to say “an” oath is stated.
Orly was careful to use the phrase “original induction”. And that may be because at one time Cook was an enlisted member.

Many (probationary) officer candidates take, or already have taken, the enlisted oath. If they are not successful with the curriculum they serve a stipulated period of time as enlisted. However, if successful, they are re-sworn with the oath appropriate for officers upon commissioning.

Without reading the entire Application and trying to understand her legal theory, it may be she thinks there is value in using the enlisted oath and emphasizing an obligation to the President. In the alternative, she may have screwed up.

(By the way, we are not arguing about this, just trying to get the facts sorted out.)


254 posted on 07/12/2009 3:17:54 PM PDT by frog in a pot (It's a myth, folks. The frog will jump out and he will be pi$$ed. Ever had big warts?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: danamco
“That does not make sense!!!

How can you sue for something before his nomination, huh???”

Easy; sue to keep his name off the ballot in primaries or to keep him from electing delegates committed to him in caucus states on the grounds that he isn't qualified for election...if you think you can prove it. Suits along those lines are not uncommon on the local and state level. The courts might well have looked at a suit or suits like that, but of course back then no one was a sore loser with no confidence in our institutions, now were they? It has been my experience over the past 33 years that the courts aren't impressed with whining losers of any political persuasion and even less so with their lawyers.

255 posted on 07/12/2009 3:27:19 PM PDT by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: urtax$@work

“You think maybe Orly messed up the pleading?”

It seems possible. As they say in the south, “bless her heart”, she is a warrior but she may have too much on her plate.

She has a huge portion of the public hoping/praying for her success; more importantly, she has Major Cook’s future and that of his family, in her hands. It is time for her to fight smart.


256 posted on 07/12/2009 3:31:06 PM PDT by frog in a pot (It's a myth, folks. The frog will jump out and he will be pi$$ed. Ever had big warts?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
The SCOTUS heard the case and issued a ruling that he could be sued.

Precedent.

257 posted on 07/12/2009 3:31:51 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: jimfree
Yes, we are stuck with Mickey as Pres until he is properly replaced. The Major is a Bozo I'm afraid.

Are YOU a Bozo too???

258 posted on 07/12/2009 3:48:30 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis
Since you are an old country lawyer, could you please counsel and enlightened us with your expertise from your keyboard how this should be handled, so that we laypeople (none-lawyers) can follow your lead to remove this illegal impostor of a scam artist from the White House???

It would very much be appreciated!!!

259 posted on 07/12/2009 3:59:14 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: danamco
Are YOU a Bozo too???

You establish your creds with that question.

260 posted on 07/12/2009 4:01:16 PM PDT by jimfree (Freep and ye shall find!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 381-400 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson