Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Women Should Not Hold Elective Office (“My old lady cut me off!!” ZOT)
July 10, 2009 | MetsJetsandNets

Posted on 07/10/2009 11:06:34 AM PDT by MetsJetsandNets

Women should not hold elective office or be in positions of authority over men. A woman's role is to serve her husband, raise children and provide a good household for her family. As we recite in our wedding vows, women are to obey men, not try and govern them.

True conservatives should not vote for a women for any office, be it a local, state or national position. It is sad that so many people are willing to have a woman as president. It would be a signal to the world that the U.S. is emasculated, and has relinquished its governance to a gender that makes decisions based on emotion, not reason. Women are hard-wired to make decisions on emotion. It is necessary for raising children.

Married women should not work outside of the home, period. And that includes running for office. Single women should be allowed to work in caregiving professions, such as nursing or teaching small children, but should return to the home full-time when married.

I think women who seek to exercise authority over men by running for political office or holding corporate positions are fundamentally unhappy and psychologically unsound. Their behavior goes against the very laws of nature. They are to be pitied, not supported.

I have never voted for a woman, nor do I plan to. Nor would I ever work under a woman. I would hope all true conservatives would adopt the same philosophy. Women are happiest in the home, not in the political arena or the workplace.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: 48businesshours; 8daysaweek; absotively; absulutly; acavemancoulddoit; allupinthekoolaid; allurzotsrbelong2us; antiambition; antipalin; deepspacezot; desperateromneybots; dnc2012strategymemo; doosh; huckabot; icanhascheezburger; longtimetroll; misogynist; misterrobblowsgoats; mittbot; mysoginist; nomam; nukemehard; nukemenow; nukezot; obamasminions; palinhater; patienttroll; plainforpresident; presidentpalin; romney4obama; romneyantipalin; romneybot; romneytrolls; sionnsar; slickwillard; sporkweasel; stenchofromney; suicidetroll; womanhaterclub; zot; zotsola; zotzola; zzzzzzoooooootttttt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last
To: MetsJetsandNets

“single women should be allowed to work in caregiving professions, such as nursing or teaching small children”

So regardless of their talents, gifts or natural aptitudes, women should not be able to express them, is this correct? If this is all the law of nature, don’t you find it a bit odd that women have abilities beyond the professions you deem appropriate?

If it were not for the female lion, bearing, protecting and hunting for her young (meaning working in and out of the home) the entire species would die off.

Male lions impregnate, lie in the trees and wander in packs of other males.

If she were not skilled in this life sustaining ways, think of her fate.

And essentially should never have financial inde


41 posted on 07/10/2009 11:16:31 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MetsJetsandNets

I missed the satire tag...didn’t I?
Let me guess.
New to planet Earth?


42 posted on 07/10/2009 11:16:42 AM PDT by astyanax (I'm here to spread peace, love and happiness... so get the f*#% out of my way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MetsJetsandNets

“banned and suspended”....see ya!


43 posted on 07/10/2009 11:16:55 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MetsJetsandNets
Hey folks,

There are arguments for this position and arguments against. What I notice here is how politically correct opposition to this is.

The other comment I will say is that if a man won't step up to do the job right, women can and will step in and do it right.

44 posted on 07/10/2009 11:16:59 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MetsJetsandNets

45 posted on 07/10/2009 11:17:22 AM PDT by Dallas59 ("You know the one with the big ears? He might be yours, but he ain't my president.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MetsJetsandNets
Neither should men.

Cases-in-point:
Barack Obama
Bill Clinton
Ted Kennedy
John Ensign
Gov. Sanford
Dan Rostenkowski
LBJ

Need I go on?

46 posted on 07/10/2009 11:17:27 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MetsJetsandNets
You said:

"I live about 10 miles west of the proverbial hamlet of Bumf*ck in an extremely hilly and timbered neck of the woods."

I bet you're married to yer cuzzin too, aintcha?

47 posted on 07/10/2009 11:17:40 AM PDT by Constitution Day (Eschew exclamatory abuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MetsJetsandNets

Go read Proverbs 31. The woman there was a good business woman.

They aren’t public dominants, they are public servants. They call them public servants for a reason. They don’t have dominance over us. They serve us. We hire and fire them. Never forget that.


48 posted on 07/10/2009 11:17:47 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Didn’t take long...


49 posted on 07/10/2009 11:18:04 AM PDT by Knitting A Conundrum (Incompetence mixed with bad ideology = change for the worst.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MetsJetsandNets

I’ve tried hard to perfect my English skills over the years but sometimes I’m not sure about things. Is this a joke? Or a troll? Or both?


50 posted on 07/10/2009 11:18:07 AM PDT by TomOnTheRun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toomanygrasshoppers

Thanks. I needed a good laugh. Thanks, again. I’m still laughing.


51 posted on 07/10/2009 11:18:21 AM PDT by Yankereb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: chs68

52 posted on 07/10/2009 11:18:32 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MetsJetsandNets
Ah yes. Your typical NY Mets, NY Jets, and NY Nets fan. Is that you Mike Lupica?
53 posted on 07/10/2009 11:18:35 AM PDT by McGruff (Don't explain; your friends don't need it, and your enemies won't believe you anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

LOL!! That is not a cheap vacuum, either...it’s a Dyson.


54 posted on 07/10/2009 11:18:35 AM PDT by Constitution Day (Eschew exclamatory abuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MetsJetsandNets

Guess their name is now, Mets, Nets, Jets and Zots.


55 posted on 07/10/2009 11:19:28 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Hey America! How's that "hope and change" thing working out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MetsJetsandNets
"Women should not hold elective office or be in positions of authority over men."

I'm glad you didn't appeal to scripture on this - since nothing about that statement can be supported via the Word of God. But, perhaps you're appealing to the Koran?

56 posted on 07/10/2009 11:19:52 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MetsJetsandNets
A woman's role is to serve her husband, raise children and provide a good household for her family.

Make your own damn sammiches lardman!

57 posted on 07/10/2009 11:20:22 AM PDT by SolidWood (Sarah Palin: "Only dead fish go with the flow!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MetsJetsandNets

Wow. Let’s go back to the 50’s where women were miserable and drugged up on uppers. Sheesh that is just crazy. My wife would clobber me if I even whispered something like that even in jest. lol. Well she has done both and likes both so I think if it is her choice than fine but seriously let’s get with the 21st century please.


58 posted on 07/10/2009 11:20:25 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MetsJetsandNets

59 posted on 07/10/2009 11:20:27 AM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MetsJetsandNets

Whooboy - who’s got the popcorn?

Colonel, USAFR


60 posted on 07/10/2009 11:21:19 AM PDT by jagusafr (Kill the red lizard, Lord! - nod to C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson