Posted on 07/09/2009 4:07:01 PM PDT by Justaham
Appearing on MSNBC Thursday afternoon, Washington Post writer and founder of the papers On Faith blog, Sally Quinn, exclaimed of Sarah Palin: "Well, clearly, she has not put her family first...And these children have, it seems publicly, to have been exploited by her in a, I think, really unfortunate way."
Even anchor David Shuster, who on Wednesday declared that Palin had "no future" politically, questioned Quinns accusation: "Sally, the use of the word exploited is pretty strong. Give us some specific examples that you think qualifies for that?" Quinn was happy to elaborate: "Well, you know, she brings them all to the convention, including Trig, the baby. She brings the pregnant daughter with the boyfriend who clearly didn't want to be there. She then travels around with the children, using them as sort of photo ops...she brings the children up when she needs them to shore up her own image."
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Let me guess, Obama hides his kids in a closet right Sally..What a disgusting pile of feces this supposed woman is, and I say woman lightly, I am still waiting on the DNA evidence to prove her gender
Oh puleese Sally. Everyone knows YOU are the biggest gold diggin’ whore out there. You make Spitzers prostitute look noble.
By the way, what are your kids doing lately? just asking...
Sally Quinn has been all over TV with her handicapped son helping flack his book. No exploitation there.
And if the kids hadn’t been at the convention, Sally Quinn would be saying “This is really bizarre behavior, not to have the family there on stage like every other candidate in recent memory. Is she trying to hide something? Is she ashamed of her Downs syndrome baby?”
I would say the media exploited them.
What did Sally exploit to get Ben?
Of course the big ZER-O doesn’t.
Sally Quinn is a woman who gave birth to a baby with profound facial deformities and has yet to accept that boy......IMHO.
She hates that Sarah so lovingly and proudly presents Trigg to the world.
So her son writes in his book that kids can be cruel.
Wonder what he thinks of his mother’s disgust at the sight of Trigg Palin.
Miss Sally is an evil evil woman with no redeeming qualities.
I wonder if there is any example of her being truly TOLERANT under this very good definition I found at
http://www.str.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=5359
“Tolerance, then, involves three elements: (1) permitting or allowing (2) a conduct or point of view one disagrees with (3) while respecting the person in the process.
“Notice that we can’t tolerate someone UNLESS we disagree with him. This is critical. We don’t “tolerate” people who share our views. They’re on our side. There’s nothing to put up with. Tolerance is reserved for those we think are wrong.
“This essential element of tolerance—disagreement—has been completely lost in the modern distortion of the concept. Nowadays, if you think someone is wrong, you’re called intolerant.
“This presents a curious problem. One must first think another is wrong in order to exercise tolerance toward him, yet doing so brings the accusation of intolerance. It’s a “Catch-22.” According to this approach, true tolerance is impossible.”
I just thought this would be an interesting point to start putting to the self-acclaimed tolerance police of the world
The level of fear and panic Sarah Palin brings forth from the left is astounding.
So the Washington Pravda’s “On Faith” blogger is this adulteress who slept with her (married) boss to get to where she is?
How many religious faiths think THAT is OK?
Parker, Dowd, Marcus, Estrich, Goodman and now Quinn and all the rest, all publishing scathing articles in a few days about Palin.
Are these people scared? Very very scared?? You betcha.
Palin has beeen accused by these feminists and others in the last 2 weeks of child exploitation, narcissist personality disorder, postparnum depression, midlife crisis, delusions of grandeur, “nutty”.
Funny, palin seems normal to me, and successful and attractive. And this lot seem like a bunch of mad ranters.
Perhaps they are projecting their own problems on to Palin?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.