Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Debbie Rowe vs The Jacksons: $100 Million or The Kids! Custody Battle Gets Nasty
Cover Awards ^ | 7/8/9 | Mark Petasky

Posted on 07/09/2009 10:52:20 AM PDT by lewisglad

OK! Magazine’s cover story features Debbie Rowe vs. The Jackson Family in a huge custody battle over MJ’s kids.

Just as the world says farewell to the King of Pop, it looks like Debbie Rowe is gearing up to get a huge payday.

CLICK HERE to see all Michael Jackson Magazine covers!

Plus, OK! features never-seen-before photos of Michael Jackson and the kids at Neverland, including MJ & the kids celebrating birthdays, weddings and even a visit from Bill Clinton.

Who should get MJ's kids?

Debbie Rowe The Jackson Family


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Music/Entertainment; Society; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: michaeljackson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: lewisglad

Duh!
Who saw that coming?

Maybe Al’s the real father.
Hey, jump in there Al. Get a piece of the action.

I love circuses.


21 posted on 07/09/2009 11:26:41 AM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (The plan... 0 in power for life. At least that's what they told him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Niuhuru

Yup, those kids may be kabillionaires, but their lives won’t be worth a plug nickel if any of the involved parties get the kids. To Debbie Rowe’s credit, I did read that she intends to get a restraining order to keep Joe Jackson away from the kids.


22 posted on 07/09/2009 11:31:25 AM PDT by Lilyjuslan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Are you sure?


23 posted on 07/09/2009 11:32:51 AM PDT by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CaptRon

Are LaToya or Rebbie doing anything at the moment?


24 posted on 07/09/2009 11:34:24 AM PDT by lewisglad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

\don’t know what you mean. If what you say it true, all contracts entered into by someone who subsequently dies are unenforceable.


25 posted on 07/09/2009 11:36:27 AM PDT by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Gosh - hasn’t she sold them twice already? (both times to Jackson).


26 posted on 07/09/2009 11:41:13 AM PDT by Verbosus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Countdown to Gloria Allred inserting herself in this mess...5..4..3.


27 posted on 07/09/2009 11:45:06 AM PDT by Right Cal Gal (Abraham Lincoln would have let Berkeley leave the Union without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bereanway
There’s just no good options out there for those kids. I’d heard Jackson established some sort of Trust for the kids that contained roughly 200 songs he’d recorded but never released which will be worth tens of millions.

In the will, he leaves everything to the trust. The beneficiaries of the trust are the kids. There are three trustees overseeing it, who all look like attorneys from different firms.

28 posted on 07/09/2009 11:47:08 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Who cares? If it is only for the money which I don’t blame the mother if that is true.

The only problem is the children who have been raised in a nutty dysfunctional family.

I would not want to have them either.

Life is too short.


29 posted on 07/09/2009 12:00:10 PM PDT by GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

I say Brooke Shields gets the kids-she’s was/is a very good friend since childhood-a perfect age for the kids-Debbie Rowe is way to selfish and besides she would only take the 2 oldest. All three should remain together. If only the judge had the power to do that and Brooke Shields would agree but then that could never happen.


30 posted on 07/09/2009 12:14:56 PM PDT by Cordio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
Michael Jackson (from hell): "$100 million? SHA-MON! He he he!!!!!!!!"

("I could grab crotch here but I'm dead and I'm on fire. Burned to a crisp! Hey, I'm black again")

31 posted on 07/09/2009 12:18:19 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (GIVE ME YOUR MONEY BITCH! - President Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

That is so sick how she could make a $ or my kids deal AGAIN. With me it would be give me my kids!!!!

Maybe they would be better off with Katherine Jackson.


32 posted on 07/09/2009 6:54:15 PM PDT by modest proposal (We got short-changed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: modest proposal

The kids will probably tell a judge they want to stay with grandma.


33 posted on 07/09/2009 7:00:55 PM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

I get the sense that Debbie Rowe traded her children to have a horse farm or something.

The whole Michael Jackson tragic and disturbing saga ended with that little girl saying she loved her daddy in front of millions (many of whom only thought of him as a disaster).

I have a feeling that probably would have mattered to him more than any of the financial success he had. Being loved. When you saw his own father laughing it up after he had just passed away you really got the sense he was probably looking to be loved.

I know he was not the best person but I found that immensely touching and heartbreaking and I hope those kids get a good home.


34 posted on 07/09/2009 8:01:48 PM PDT by modest proposal (We got short-changed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Color me confused, but since I never gave a rats ass about MJ I never heard that he had kids with Debbie Rowe, and my question is, who the hell is she and why would MJ have kids with her of all people?


35 posted on 07/09/2009 8:05:37 PM PDT by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cordio

Brooke would do it, I imagine, too. Wouldn’t want these kids to not be taught about their Caucasian heritage.


36 posted on 07/09/2009 8:05:41 PM PDT by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (****************************Stop Continental Drift**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

She was the nurse of a dermatologist he visited. They were friends for a long time beacuse both liked animals. Lisa Marie refused to have his kids and Rowe offered. Rowe had them and then took a cash settlement in lieu of her parental rights and now has a horse farm somewhere.

There now you are caught up on the soap opera drama.


37 posted on 07/09/2009 8:23:26 PM PDT by modest proposal (We got short-changed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: modest proposal

Thanks, and good luck to them all!


38 posted on 07/09/2009 8:46:47 PM PDT by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: modest proposal

The only person who probably cares about the kids is grandma. Other people might eventually fight for the kids because of the money involved. If the dermatologist is the father, he might decide to go for the money too.


39 posted on 07/10/2009 3:49:24 AM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Lilyjuslan

I am beginning to wonder if maybe Rowe will get the kids. An animal farm would be best since it would take them out of the press fray and away from the exploitative Jacksons.

I wonder what her financial means were before Jackson. It is possible he decided to use a poorer woman, mainly because he would hold the financial whip hand over her if she tried to get the kids from him. It isn’t an impossible idea and Jackson was a very shrewd businessperson despite his childishness.

If she is (and possibly is, but you never know) the biological mother, she has rights that take precedence. I hope she gets them, chances are they won’t be exploited. I remember hoping that Birkhead would get Anna Nicole Smith’s child and he has.


40 posted on 07/10/2009 8:09:25 AM PDT by Niuhuru (The internet is the digital AIDS; adapting and successfully destroying the MSM host.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson