Good thing you caught the spelling error, thanks.
Who determines whether one persons’ point of interference interferes with anothers? How are unreasonable points of interference determined?
That’s why we have a judicial branch, but common sense usulally works pretty well.
It is rooted in Natural Law, which is derived from the Law of our Creator. Our Constitution put their Natural Law philosophy into action.
A long line of smart guys from Aristotle, Cicero, St. Thomas Aquinas and John Locke developed the ideas of our founders. My interest in Natural Law began recently with Levin's Liberty & Tyranny where he writes, "The abandonment of Natural Law is the adoption of tyranny in one form or another because there is no humane or benevolent alternative to Natural Law. It is Natural Law divined by God and discoverable by reason, that prescribes the inalienability of the most fundamental and eternal human rights. Rights that are not conferred on man by man and therefore cannot legitimately be denied to man by man."
These concepts are unknown because if they were more fully known by the populace, they would form a philosophical basis of opposition to what the democrat party stands for. The last thing our government schools wish to do is present our founding and Constitution for the miracles they are.
My book list on the subject so far is,
The 5,000 Year Leap
Liberty and Tyranny
Natural Law, Reflection on Theory and Practice
Written on the Heart, The Case for Natural Law
Christianity, Democracy and the American Ideal