Megan Fox
(can someone please photoshop out the tattoos? They're screwing up my viewing pleasure!)
Mark
If you have seen this movie is it worth the price of admission?
I could have told the writer that.
The reviews just confirmed that I would like the movie. Me and the munchkin will see it this coming weekend.
The first one was better, of course. But I liked this one, and will probably see it again because a lot of things happen and a lot of dialogue gets missed because of all the action. The ending is a little drawn out, but it is forgivable because of all the action. There is some good humor in it also.
Megan Fox
(can someone please photoshop out the tattoos? They're screwing up my viewing pleasure!)
Mark
I never pay attention to reviews. We saw it yesterday, and thought it was very good, and certainly worth the $7.50 admission.
Shows how much I know about Transformers, I thought Shia LaBeouf was a woman’s name.
If you like giant robots kicking the crap out of each other, then this is the movie for you. I thought it was a bit too long. The first one was a “tighter” flim, this one has a few loose ends. The special effects are beautiful and I love the fact that the US military is a strong, well represented force that plays for keeps. I thought the pencil neck government geek was made to look like Donald Rumsfeld.
I would give it 4 out of 5 stars, just because it is drawn out a bit too long.
According to my 17 year old son, who has seen it twice:
1. Megan Fox is smoking hot.
2. When Obama is diss’ed by name, the audience cheered (in purple-turning-blue New Mexico!)
3. He enjoyed it as much, if not more, than The Dark Knight.
4. Too much cursing.
It is on my “must see” list.