Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Steelfish
Seriously, the shoes don't go with the dress


2 posted on 06/28/2009 7:32:53 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: netmilsmom

Neat figure though - thanks for the pic post.


3 posted on 06/28/2009 7:34:27 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom

There’s shoes?


4 posted on 06/28/2009 7:36:10 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (ALSO SPRACH ZEROTHUSTRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom

The shoes are HOT!


8 posted on 06/28/2009 7:37:48 PM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom

Agree. Better with an open toe heel. Shoes can make or break the dress.


9 posted on 06/28/2009 7:39:16 PM PDT by VicVega (Join Jihad, get captured by the US and resettled in the best places in the world. I love the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom

“Frock” is the right word. ‘60s fashions were awful.

This one’s half acceptable because it’s plain rather than some of the silly things they used to plaster on those shapeless things.


16 posted on 06/28/2009 8:03:36 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom

Good looks must run in the family. It’s refreshing to see a lovely young woman confident enough in her beauty that she doesn’t feel the need to look trampy.


18 posted on 06/28/2009 8:04:25 PM PDT by constitutiongirl ("Duty is ours. Consequences are God's."- General Thomas 'Stonewall' Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom
Katy's granny in 1966

Katy Baxter in 2009


19 posted on 06/28/2009 8:05:19 PM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom

Here is another picture of Katy in the dress.

21 posted on 06/28/2009 8:07:54 PM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom
Seriously, it was probably all she could find to buy in the stores. That dress was probably worn with a clunky heel, but they're difficult to locate. All the shoes for fall look like these, which I will no doubt break my ankle wearing:

http://www.neimanmarcus.com/store/catalog/templates/P6.jhtml?itemId=cat22010736&parentId=cat12310741&masterId=cat6170735&cmCat=

which is what a lot of the summer dress shoes looked like. I think they're a little S&M for daily wear.

22 posted on 06/28/2009 8:13:20 PM PDT by La Lydia (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom

Very pretty and wholesome looking young lady.


23 posted on 06/28/2009 8:14:31 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom; xsmommy; Gabz; secret garden; tioga; Texan5; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; Tax-chick
Seriously, the shoes don't go with the dress

What? Grey or silver and grey, maybe, with perhaps 1/2” or 3/4” shorter heels? Perhaps the heels would be better proportioned if they were 3/32 larger at the tip.

24 posted on 06/28/2009 8:19:52 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom

Nice!


26 posted on 06/28/2009 8:22:38 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom

Figures - men discuss her obvious pulchritude, while women discuss her...shoes. LOL!


31 posted on 06/28/2009 8:37:56 PM PDT by TrueKnightGalahad (When you're racing...it's life. Anything that happens before or after is just waiting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom
The shoes are wrong, and hair is wrong -- it should be lifted up or be worn short in order to emphasize the most important design elment of the dress, which is its cut at the neck and shoulders. And then she should have added long dangling earrings to emphasize it even more.

More appropriate shoes would have been refined-line high-heeled sandals of a similar hue to the dress.

35 posted on 06/28/2009 8:44:57 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom
Seriously, the shoes don't go with the dress

Shoes?

37 posted on 06/28/2009 8:45:22 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom
It was an ugly sack in the 60’s and it is an ugly sack now. pretty girl tho’.
52 posted on 06/29/2009 5:26:37 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom

The legs do though.


54 posted on 06/29/2009 5:33:24 AM PDT by Royal Wulff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom

The hetero guys don’t even notice she’s wearing shoes.


60 posted on 06/29/2009 5:52:03 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom
I don't mind the shoes and I love the dress.

Maybe her grandma could loan something to our First *cough* Lady to help her dress for her position.

66 posted on 06/29/2009 6:44:12 AM PDT by CAluvdubya (Bono-Mack, Castle,Kirk,Lance.LoBiondo,Reichert,Smith,McHugh..WE ARE COMING...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: netmilsmom

Yeah. She needed go-go boots.

But it’s cute and even somewhat modest. I like her in it. I think I’d let my daughters dress in something like it.


69 posted on 06/29/2009 6:51:22 AM PDT by Little Ray (Do we have a Plan B?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson