Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Does a second home mean a second vote? (vanity)

Posted on 06/28/2009 3:14:57 PM PDT by cradle of freedom

We all know how many lefties from NYC moved to Vermont and changed the voting pattern in that state. Vermont now has two left wing senators because of this mass migration from New York. If they are living in NYC as their primary address, it would not be difficult to imagine that many of them could have second homes in Vermont. I wouldn't put it past them to use both of their addresses to vote. I wouldn't be surprised if this was a mass scale organized action to take over a small state.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: acorn; agenda; democrats; stealingelections; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 06/28/2009 3:14:57 PM PDT by cradle of freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom
One vote per acre owned

2 posted on 06/28/2009 3:16:47 PM PDT by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

3 posted on 06/28/2009 3:17:45 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

For the second vote you have to join ACORN.


4 posted on 06/28/2009 3:18:11 PM PDT by Mark was here (The earth is bipolar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark was here

Already being done by those living in FL part of the year. ONe absentee, one in person.


5 posted on 06/28/2009 3:21:23 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Hey hey! Ho ho! Where's your Birth Certificate/ We've a right to know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom
I have worked with these self proclaimed progressives (read marxists) who consider any means to their communist end.

There are enclaves of them in Brooklyn who have their Vermont places for the purpose of overthrowing legal governments. It is the whole ben and jerry phenomena

6 posted on 06/28/2009 3:21:54 PM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

So, let me get this straight. You’re actually suggesting Democrats might be engaging in vote fraud?

I’m shocked.

Seriously, voting shenanigans have been one of the core principals of the Democratic party since at least the mid 60s. The flavor of the month in this regard, while interesting, is somewhat irrelevant.


7 posted on 06/28/2009 3:23:24 PM PDT by chrisser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom
I don't know about Vermont,but I've read that New Hampshire has a law that says that you can show up at a polling station,ON ELECTION DAY,and say that you've moved into the state and you get a ballot without having to show *any* proof of your claim.Knowing Massachusetts RATS like I do I'd wager the shirt on my back that there's a connection between that law and the *very* recent turn of the state into a RAT stronghold.
8 posted on 06/28/2009 3:24:24 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Christian+Veteran=Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

I think some people living and voting in Ohio with their primary residence in New York, pleaded guilty to voter fraud or something like that some months ago.

It would be interesting to see if a comparison of voter lists would produce duplicate names.


9 posted on 06/28/2009 3:26:16 PM PDT by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

Liberals WOULD be inclined to vote twice....”for the good of the people!”


10 posted on 06/28/2009 3:27:06 PM PDT by 2harddrive (then)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chrisser
... voting shenanigans have been one of the core principals of the Democratic party since at least the mid 60s.

Go back further... to the 1860s and before. Tammany Hall comes to mind.

11 posted on 06/28/2009 3:28:13 PM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

Vermont is much to far away for a weekend home. You want to be able to get there in two hours max. That means the Hamptons, or Litchfield County, or upstate NY.


12 posted on 06/28/2009 3:35:10 PM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maine Mariner

During the last election a freeper fr-mailed me from Alabama....Two bus loads of voters from a church in the neighborhood were heading to Ohio to vote.... People in both states were contacted....nothing was done....too late. Laws have to be changed.


13 posted on 06/28/2009 3:38:04 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Hey hey! Ho ho! Where's your Birth Certificate/ We've a right to know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

We have an old black man with a residence inGergia and one in South Carolina that was bragging how he got to vote in each state for Obama.


14 posted on 06/28/2009 3:41:15 PM PDT by Uncle Meat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

I heard just a little about this, I think it was back after the 2000 election.

Now who would be that interested in the voting process to actually do this? Would these people be regular citizens or could they be government employees?


15 posted on 06/28/2009 3:46:30 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

I was listening to a local radio program (Massachusetts) during this past presidential primary. One woman who called in said that she lived in Massachusetts but had a second home in New Hampshire. A New Hampshire neighbor of her’s said that she noticed that the Massachusetts resident’s name had been crossed off in the voters’ registration book. Someone had voted in the name of the Massachusetts woman who had a second home in New Hampshire.


16 posted on 06/28/2009 3:51:59 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

I was listening to a local radio program (Massachusetts) during this past presidential primary. One woman who called in said that she lived in Massachusetts but had a second home in New Hampshire. A New Hampshire neighbor of her’s said that she noticed that the Massachusetts resident’s name had been crossed off in the voters’ registration book. Someone had voted in the name of the Massachusetts woman who had a second home in New Hampshire.


17 posted on 06/28/2009 3:51:59 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom
She told me church member. My cousin in Indianapolis has seen the buses pull up, Here district in one election had 120% of the registered voters vote.....That's correct 120%. Indiana changed the law.

Now we have out of state students getting Indiana drivers license, voting in our state, living in the dorms....( our tuition is so low they can pay out-of-state tuition that in lower than the in-state tuitions on either coast) New laws and higher out-of-state tuitions needed.

18 posted on 06/28/2009 3:53:32 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Hey hey! Ho ho! Where's your Birth Certificate/ We've a right to know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom

When I was growing up in a strongly Democratic, Union, high crime midwest county, it was a matter pride to vote in three states.

It got you bragging rights in the saloons and union halls, you were doing your part for America, often good for a free drink.

These folks also registered their automobiles, got drivers licenses and auto insurance in which ever state was cheapest. Cant do that anymore, but you can sure still vote in 3 states, or 10.

When I was in a Western State recently, I learned that many carloads of men and women drive from polling place to polling place, voting for all the names that have not voted yet. Yep, dead people too. The election judges just winked at them.

No question that tens of thousands of Democrats have won elections thru voter fraud that would have lost honest elections.


19 posted on 06/28/2009 3:53:56 PM PDT by larry hagedon (born and raised and retired in Iowa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

I’ll will never forget the spectacle of the 2004 anti-Republican demonstration in NYC. Hordes of people were marching in the streets because - horror of horrors - the Republicans were having a convention in NYC. The crowd was estimated at 40,000. I left my tv on at CSPAN just to take this all in. This march took 4 hours. The streets which held about 10-12 people across were totally packed with people. The waves of people just kept coming for 4 hours nonstop! What a bunch of nutballs!

If 40,000 NYC leftists could be that motivated to organize this huge rally just because the Republican Party was in town for a convention, it would not be surprising if large numbers of them organized in the 1970’s and decided that they would take over a state. These people are just fanatical enough to do this and there are large numbers of them concentrated in New York.


20 posted on 06/28/2009 4:00:24 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson