Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: decimon
I knew something was 'funny' about this story! The headline is misleading. They're talking about mass and bulk, not height or length.

"Scientists have discovered that the original statistical model used to calculate dinosaur mass is flawed, suggesting dinosaurs have been oversized.

Widely cited estimates for the mass of Apatosaurus louisae, one of the largest of the dinosaurs, may be double that of its actual mass (38 tonnes vs. 18 tonnes)."

Dinosaurs May Have Been Smaller Than Previously Thought:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090621195620.htm

5 posted on 06/24/2009 4:29:45 AM PDT by ETL (ALL the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ETL

How big was the Ophrasaurus?


6 posted on 06/24/2009 4:37:07 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Barak Obama: Pontificator in Chief and Poster Child for the Peter Principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ETL
They're talking about mass and bulk, not height or length.

Yup. More svelte.

8 posted on 06/24/2009 4:37:56 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ETL
Widely cited estimates for the mass of Apatosaurus louisae, one of the largest of the dinosaurs, may be double that of its actual mass (38 tonnes vs. 18 tonnes)."

What's a tonne?

25 posted on 06/24/2009 5:55:58 AM PDT by frithguild (Can I drill your head now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson