Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BGHater

I am no expert on nuclear ordinance, but it seems to me that such a weapon MUST be emitting radiation. And certainly we have improved our radioactivity detection devices since that age. So shouldn’t such devices be brought to the area and a search begun anew?


3 posted on 06/23/2009 1:40:41 PM PDT by theDentist (qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: theDentist

Dunno.

Lot’s of Hurricanes, ebb and flow, have occured since then. It could be covered with so much sand that it would be impossible to find.


5 posted on 06/23/2009 1:42:23 PM PDT by BGHater (Insanity is voting for Republicans and expecting Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: theDentist
I am no expert on nuclear ordinance, but it seems to me that such a weapon MUST be emitting radiation

Plutonium is an alpha emitter.

7 posted on 06/23/2009 1:45:35 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: theDentist

There was a TV special about the recent hunt for the bomb.
It’s a private organization looking for the bomb. Kind of like Moster Quest only it’s a bomb quest.


14 posted on 06/23/2009 1:48:57 PM PDT by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: theDentist

You’d have to be real close to be able to detect any radiation emitted...Probably within 20-25 feet. The water surrounding the bomb would attenuate all the radiation beyond that point. And if the bomb has silted over to any significant amount, forget it—something that heavy probably buried itself at least halfway in the seabed anyway.


18 posted on 06/23/2009 1:50:54 PM PDT by rottndog (Freedom IS NOT FREE--Let us NEVER FORGET those that have paid the highest price for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: theDentist
It was a Mark 15 IIRC. It is deep enough that the radiation couldn't be used to recover it.

No danger of it going off, it went in unarmed, and sufficient decay over 50 years should prevent it now if it should arm. For 10 years they kept the onshore area restricted for that reason.

27 posted on 06/23/2009 1:59:50 PM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: theDentist

No “plutonium trigger?”


30 posted on 06/23/2009 2:05:45 PM PDT by arthurus (ACORN + Amnesty = Venezuelan Democracy in the USSSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson