Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Mighty Martin' WWII flying boats to fight fires (new life for old aircraft)
The Daily Breeze (LA area news) ^ | 06/22/2009 | wire service reports

Posted on 06/23/2009 11:19:06 AM PDT by SERKIT

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: 2111USMC
I read a magazine article on these amazing planes up in BC one summer. When they are scooping water up "on the fly" they have to be below 81 knots and above 78 knots.

Too fast and they rip the scoop plumbing out of the bottom.

Too slow and they simply get too heavy, stop flying and must land.

21 posted on 06/23/2009 12:17:21 PM PDT by HardStarboard ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule - Mencken knew Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: OrioleFan
Most were scrapped, but two Flying Boats were purchased by a Canadian company and used to scoop up water from lakes and bays to fight fires in British Columbia. They have been sold to a new company, which tried but failed to win a government contract to fight fires in California last year.

I believe Canada got 4 of the flying boats. One was lost in a accident, one was lost in a typhoon. The also got all the spare parts which I believe included 60 spare engines. I think they paid $50,000 for the whole lot.

The Martin Museum put in a bid for one of the planes, but lost to the current owner. There are stories in Canada about these planes putting out fires before the firefighters could get to them up there. Also because the planes skim over the lake to pick up a load of water, they can actually put more water on a fire than that DC-10 that CalFire uses.

22 posted on 06/23/2009 12:20:39 PM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is the 4th of July, democrats believe every day is April 15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT

I remember watching these aircraft landing and taking off from San Francisco Bay back in 1951-2 when I was 5 years old and my Dad was recalled to the Navy and stationed at Oakland Naval Air Station (Now Oakland International). They were sure impressive!


23 posted on 06/23/2009 12:29:51 PM PDT by Redleg Duke ("Sarah Palin...Unleashing the Fury of the Castrated Left!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa
Man, send that big boy to Houston, loaded with water. It is dry as dust here.
24 posted on 06/23/2009 1:40:38 PM PDT by Tahoe3002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

Because the Mars can reload itself and continue fighting fire without having to land, stop, and get refilled, it can put more water/retardant mix on a fire in an hour than ANY OTHER AIRCRAFT, bar none.

This is especially true when there is a large lake, wide river, or the ocean near a wildfire.

Sure, the 747 can drop more in one pass, but it GETS only ONE pass.

Don’t kid yourself, 25 tons of water is a LOT of water!

When the doors open, the aircraft seems to climb 2000 feet in 15 seconds as the water leaves the tanks. It is a sight to behold indeed!


25 posted on 06/23/2009 3:52:41 PM PDT by Don W (People who think are a threat to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Don W
In the desert West there are VERY few places a Mars could relaod. In my area there are only two lakes big enough and they are often VERY stormy. The Supertanker brings THREE times (with many drop options from 2,200 to ALL 20,000 gallons) the payload and cycle time within an hour due to the speed of the airplane. Watch the video and see a 747 fly after dumping 20,000 gallons in one THREE mile lane.

http://www.evergreensupertanker.com/

26 posted on 06/23/2009 4:02:36 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Nemo me impune lacessit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 2111USMC
It just “scoops down” to pick up 25 tons? Holy cow!

But wait, there;s more!

From Pistolshot's link at reply #7

http://www.martinmars.com/

The most frequently asked question regarding the Mars is "How do they pick up their water?".

This part of the flying operation is, perhaps, the most demanding in terms of teamwork among the crew.

The Captain executes a normal landing, keeps the the aircraft "on the step" and allows the speed to decrease to 70 knots.

He then passes engine power to the Flight Engineer and selects the scoops to the "down" position.

The ram pressure for injecting the water into the tanks is such that the aircraft is taking on water at a rate in excess of a ton per second.

To account for this added weight, the Flight Engineer must advance the throttles to maintain a skimming speed of 60-70 knots to ensure the aircraft remains on the step.

Pickup time is, on average, 25 seconds.

When the tanks are full, the Captain will have the scoops raised, call for takeoff power from the Flight Engineer and carry out a normal loaded takeoff.

Once airborne, the foam concentrate is injected into the water load (normally, 30 US gallons of concentrate into the 7,200 US gallon water load) where it is dispersed and remains inert until the load is dropped.

Once dropped, the tumbling action causes expansion which converts the water load into a foam load.

This process is repeated for each drop.

In other words, this vital team work is carried out, on average, every 15 minutes per aircraft.

For a Gel drop , the concentrate is injected during the scooping process to allow even mixing.

27 posted on 06/23/2009 4:12:03 PM PDT by Covenantor ("Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: magslinger

ping


28 posted on 06/23/2009 5:06:54 PM PDT by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; Bean Counter; investigateworld; ...
SONOBUOY PING!

Click on pic for past Navair pings.

Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
The only requirement for inclusion in the Navair Pinglist is an interest in Naval Aviation.
This is a medium to low volume pinglist.

29 posted on 06/24/2009 5:41:47 AM PDT by magslinger (Inside every father is a Bryan Mills waiting to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT; exg; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; Cannoneer No. 4; ...

-


30 posted on 06/24/2009 7:49:12 AM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hatteras

That is a hoot..thanks..


31 posted on 06/24/2009 8:05:33 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: magslinger; All

Anyone have info as to how this compares with the Spruce Goose, and why the military was developing TWO similar aircraft during the war..?


32 posted on 06/24/2009 8:06:46 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Old Flat Toad
I think thats the Martin Mariner.

Yep. The Mariner and the PBY Catalina both had two engines.

I never saw one of these four engine monsters. That is one big airplane!

33 posted on 06/24/2009 8:41:09 AM PDT by Ole Okie (Simply an American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

In the desert west there are also few places that would require the services of airborn firefighting. Sand and suguaros seldom catch fire.

You’re also claiming that Lake Mead is often stormy? If it’s stormy enough to stop the Mars from re-tanking, it’s surely stormy enough to prevent a low pass by a 747, since the 747 was designed to fly at high speed and altitude, while the Mars is in its element at low altitude.

Yes, I slightly underestimated the 747, but stand by the Mars as a far superior platform. 20K gallons in one go, cool. An hour between tank drops, not so good.

The Mars has done yeoman’s service in aerial water drops for years. Granted, only 7K gallons per drop, but only 15 minutes between drops means that less water is needed to contain a fire simply because leaving a fire for an hour (or more) allows that fire to get totally out of hand.

Rather than sniping at each other, let’s agree that it’s a good thing this resource is available for fire supression RIGHT NOW.

BTW just a couple of years ago, the Mars was used to put out a fire 6 miles (and growing closer) from my house, which may have a minor effect on my esteem for it. I love those planes!


34 posted on 06/24/2009 9:50:24 AM PDT by Don W (People who think are a threat to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: stylecouncilor

ping


35 posted on 06/24/2009 11:51:59 AM PDT by onedoug (SARAH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT; Clive
Got ta have a few pics of the ol gal

Regards

alfa6 ;>}

36 posted on 06/24/2009 12:00:36 PM PDT by alfa6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don W
Lake Meade is 500 miles away from me and your perception of the high desert is way off. Tahoe and Pyramid often have waves up to 6 feet even in the summer. A sagebrush fire is a thing to behold it burns like gasoline soaked rags. The really important thing in a range fire is that it be stopped as soon as possible. The Supertanker could be there in a half hour or less from 200 miles out and stomp it down. It could be there in some cases hours before any ground crew could reach the fire. We have lost about a million arc es to fire in the last five years in the high desert. The complete lack of C-130’s and other heavy aircraft has been a major problem in the situation. The Mars would be close to useless to Nevada, Utah, Southern Oregon and Idaho.
37 posted on 06/24/2009 12:21:31 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Nemo me impune lacessit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
I wonder what happened to all the P-5Ms the Navy retired back in the 70’s.

I worked at Texas Instruments in Dallas back in the P5M days when we built APS-80 ASW radars for them. One of the ASW engineering group tried to arrange to have one of the P5Ms brought to Mountain Creek Lake by Dallas NAS, but they would not do it, because they said the boats leaked so much that they would probably sink in a day or two. They were expected to be pulled up on the beach any place they landed, amd the beaching facilities at Dallas NAS had been decommisioned, if there were any. I recall seeing big flying boats passing over on the east-west airway through Dallas during WW2 though.

38 posted on 06/24/2009 1:38:29 PM PDT by 19th LA Inf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: OrioleFan

When the 5 missing TBF’s off of Florida in 1945 a Martin Mariner was lost during the search. It was believed to have exploded in the air with no survivors or wreckage ever found.


39 posted on 06/24/2009 1:48:21 PM PDT by GOYAKLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson