Wrong again, Squat-to-Post. As previously noted, my view is consistent with the published views of Madison & Jefferson, the most respected legal references of the era, and with the Constitution. Yours is not - in fact, yours is nothing but a personal opinion, based on pseudo-logic & rationalizations. Therefore, yours is the "highly biased reinterpretation."
(As I noted previously, you sound exactly like a liberal politician - you even accuse conservatives of doing what you, yourself are doing [pushing a "highly biased reinterpretation"], just like the D@mocrats. ;>)
...intending to justify the indefensible history of the period...
What, precisely, was "indefensible?" State secession? You have yet to come anywhere near proving that secession was unconstitutional - and your other views (which you for some reason apparently felt compelled to offer here) are irrelevant with regard to that issue.
"...yours amounts to historical revisionism accuracy."
Oh, you betcha, Squat-to-Post - you've got a view of history that's about as accurate as the one espoused by Karl Marx. You're an historical revisionist (and a constitutional ignoramus), plain & simple...
"There, fixed it."
;-)
"yours is nothing but a personal opinion, based on pseudo-logic & rationalizations"
"you sound exactly like a liberal politician - you even accuse conservatives of doing what you, yourself are doing "
"Oh, you betcha, Squat-to-Post - you've got a view of history that's about as accurate as the one espoused by Karl Marx"
"an historical revisionist (and a constitutional ignoramus), plain & simple..."
Like I said: the old Rebel Yell battle cry. Delivered all the more ferociously when Southern troops ran out of ammunition -- which was frequent. ;-)