Ryan Seacrest. Bwahaha!
Posted on 06/09/2009 8:12:07 AM PDT by Scythian
Adam is no Freddie Mercury.
Nothing wrong with gay singers, I mean who cares if Rob Halford is gay, JP Rocks! Adam is meant more for Broadway, I don’t see him as a rocker in the vein of Freddie or Rob.
So there are absolutely no gay men out there that only have one partner? None of them aere using condoms? ALL of them are having sex in bathrooms with multiple men? You have witnessed this with your own two eyes? Once again your ignorance shines through.
Well...you are right. You state it at the lowest level, which is EXACTLY what homosexual sex is...it IS NOT SEX, it is perverted pleasuring resulting from a psychological illness.
An orgasm feels good no matter how you achieve it, without a filter inside the head to promote healthy, man woman, nut bolt, female male coupling, really dirty actions arise.
Homosexuals have a HUGE need to be considered normal.
Even when, in the case of two males, one pretends to be a girl and one a boy. Same with lesbians. One acts like a boy the other, a girl...in some creepy FANTASY.
Look at Ellen...she acts and dresses just like a man. There is no denying that. Why?Because she wishes she were a man. So she staps on and plays the role to her girfriends girlish mode. Creepy.
And BECAUSE Ellen wishes she were a man we are supposed to consider it a normal desire. I don't. I like her. But I do NOT WANT TO KNOW WHAT SHE DOES IN HER BEDROOM. Same with Adam. It is creepy. It feels dirty at a gut level. And there IS a reason for that. It IS filthy. And they know it.
Ryan Seacrest. Bwahaha!
You’re kidding? Seacrest? LOL.
You might want to rephrase that.
I know it’s hard to tell - he looks more manly in that picture.
Who is Adam Lambert? Should I know him? Is he important? Do we need him? Should I bother with answers?
“He is also the second gay contender that lost the final showdown to a lesser performer.”
Sometimes I feel like generalizing from that fact, in the vein of, “Middle America just isn’t ready.” Then I consider the fact that while Adam was a smash-up of Heavy Metal, Glam, and Emo, Clay was strongest in the style Disney cartoon ballads. So aside from the fact that everyone knew they were gay, they didn’t have much in common.
“So you have had access to his medical records...”
Lighten up. Pretty sure the point of that post was to make the “who cares” extra meaningful by exagerrating the objectionability.
Who is Adam Lambert and why should I care?
I have never watched American Idol, but it seems like harmless entertainment.
Ewww - did I mention that’s “Ewww” with a capital EWWW?
:)
So as long as you exaggerate, you can be as ignorant as you want and not be called on it? I’m sure there are those at Daily Kos will love to hear that.
“So as long as you exaggerate, you can be as ignorant as you want and not be called on it?”
Yes. It’s called humor. Which is often based on absurdity, or more specifically in this case the contrast between the absurd premise and the measured punchline.
Actually, yes and no. It is possible to be too absurd, or too mean in your attempt at humor. There has to be some truth to the matter for it to be funny. In this case, it is undeniably true that homosexuals have a higher incidence of STDs, and beyond that it’s a well-etablished stereotype.
I suppose George Michael clued him in on it.
Sounded more hate filled to me and lacked any punchline at all. But then there are those who think a picture of watermelons on the White House lawn is funny too.
Shucks! 8)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.