So after a single hit with a laser the 100W bulb now uses 40W and is brighter... EXCELLENT!!!! No more Hg & lead for CFB!!!
1 posted on
06/02/2009 9:19:08 AM PDT by
Freeport
To: Freeport
too bad they are now illegal.....................
2 posted on
06/02/2009 9:23:17 AM PDT by
PeterPrinciple
( Seeking the truth here folks.)
To: Freeport
To late. The King Obama machine has outlawed the bulb to be implemented in a few years. This piece of crap just don't understand that freeing Americans and progress will happen. Tie our hands and we will be living like a third world hut, shivering in the cold, society.
3 posted on
06/02/2009 9:23:56 AM PDT by
Logical me
(Oh, well!!!)
To: Freeport
The pulse lasts a mere femtosecond, and delivers as much power as the entire grid of North America into a needle point size spot What I am looking for, and haven't found, is what the TOTAL WATTAGE of the laser blast is. We know it is very quick, and we know it is VERY powerful.
But if power/time turns out to be greater than the power saved by the treatment, it won't be useful.
To: Freeport
“guilt” ??
Anyone who feels guilty about a light bulb is a DIM BULB!
6 posted on
06/02/2009 9:33:31 AM PDT by
Kansas58
To: Freeport
The article never says the new bulb operates at 40 watts. It says ‘less than 60 watts’. Still neat they can do it, but what you are saying was not said in the article.
I would also hope they do some testing on these bulbs to determine lifetime operating ranges for it. They just altered the filament structure blasting it with a high energy laser - hopefully it doesn’t shorten the life of the bulb, or weaken the filament to where it breaks to easily.
11 posted on
06/02/2009 9:42:33 AM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
To: Freeport
Amazing what the free can come up with
13 posted on
06/02/2009 10:07:11 AM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: Freeport
Interesting. If this is true, and I hope it is, it will be ignored by the mainstream media and the democrats because it would invalidate the stupid law they passed that bans incandescent bulbs. (The law that was NEVER reported on ANYWHERE in the mainstream media)
15 posted on
06/02/2009 10:28:17 AM PDT by
Leftism is Mentally Deranged
(liberalism allows you to have 2 contradictory thoughts in your mind at the same time)
To: Freeport
Too late. The good light bulbs are already slated to be banned and they won’t be coming back without a company making and selling them on the black market or a revolution.
17 posted on
06/02/2009 11:20:21 AM PDT by
Domandred
(Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.)
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
New approach offers more pleasant light of traditional bulbs without the energy guilt... Traditionally, incandescent light bulbs provide more pleasant light, however they lack the efficiency of fluorescent designs. The new bulb offers the brightness and color of a 100 watt incandescent bulb while using less than 60 watts.
My energy guilt level was already pretty low. Those having trouble with this, just think of Al Gore's mansion and his SUVs.
22 posted on
06/02/2009 3:14:47 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: ShadowAce
...an ultra-fast, ultra-powerful laser... pulse lasts a mere femtosecond, and delivers as much power as the entire grid of North America into a needle point size spot.
Huh?
23 posted on
06/02/2009 3:18:32 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: Freeport
The pulse lasts a mere femtosecond, and delivers as much power as the entire grid of North America into a needle point size spot. Whoa???
24 posted on
06/03/2009 12:15:47 AM PDT by
rawhide
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson