Skip to comments.
Catherine Zeta Jones Paid $5,700 Per Second To Star In Shampoo Commercial
All Headline News ^
| June 1, 2009
| Shannon McGregor
Posted on 06/02/2009 5:04:24 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Merry Christmas, Boys! ;)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Catherine Zeta Jones Paid $5,700 Per Second To Star In Shampoo Commercial Shoot, I would have starred in that commercial for half the price.
2
posted on
06/02/2009 5:06:01 AM PDT
by
SIDENET
(Hubba Hubba...)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
$2.4 Mil for a 7 minute tv ad????
That’s gotta be a record.
3
posted on
06/02/2009 5:06:27 AM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(http://ccwsaveslives.blogspot.com/)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Hey Maureen,
what’s the Times pay per second?
4
posted on
06/02/2009 5:06:29 AM PDT
by
downwdims
(It does not take a majority to prevail... but rather an irate, tireless minority)
To: downwdims
5
posted on
06/02/2009 5:08:08 AM PDT
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
6
posted on
06/02/2009 5:08:32 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
To: downwdims
7
posted on
06/02/2009 5:08:40 AM PDT
by
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Maybe she can sell a lot of shampoo. A few folks might in fact utilize more shampoo with her image in their heads.
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Hey, if they’re willing to pay her, she’s worth it. Now, if we can just keep Capitalism and the markets alive until the Post Obama Era...
To: Diana in Wisconsin
For Lux:
10
posted on
06/02/2009 5:11:40 AM PDT
by
King Moonracer
(Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
...and worth every penny of it.
11
posted on
06/02/2009 5:13:24 AM PDT
by
TADSLOS
(Powell/Whorealdo 2012- The New GOP Dream Ticket)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Underpaid.
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Meanwhile, Mo Dowd was told that even if she paid a similar amount, there would be no commercial for her.
13
posted on
06/02/2009 5:20:18 AM PDT
by
fso301
To: abb
Q: Is Maureen Dowd necessary?
A: No, actually.
To: Red in Blue PA
Figuring the average number of hairs on the human head is around 140,000, that doesn’t seem so high. It’s about 17 bucks per hair. Seems reasonable to me.
15
posted on
06/02/2009 5:30:16 AM PDT
by
newheart
(Obama. We kind of underestimated the creepiness.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
One of only a handful of natural beauties in today’s Hollywood.
To: Diana in Wisconsin
The headline sounds as if Catherine Zeta paid to star in the commercial:)
17
posted on
06/02/2009 5:50:01 AM PDT
by
calex59
To: NavyCanDo
Natural beauty?
It’s widely known she has had breast enhancement.....
18
posted on
06/02/2009 6:11:02 AM PDT
by
Nabber
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Fair is Fair
19
posted on
06/02/2009 6:13:43 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
(The Huskies are Gator Bait!)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
If I were as rich as her, I could afford to pay $5,700 per second to star in a shampoo commercial too.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
