The Survival of Billy Best Proves Cancer Doctors Wrong about Daniel Hauser

Natural News ^

[Scythian]

(NaturalNews) If there's one thing that cancer doctors and health authorities can't stand, it's being wrong. And in the case of 13-year-old Daniel Hauser, the cancer doctors insist that unless the boy submits to chemotherapy as a "treatment" for Hodgkin's Lymphoma, he will almost certainly die.

But there's a problem with that claim. The problem is a man named Billy Best, now 31 years old, who was diagnosed with Hodgkin's Lymphoma at the age of 16. Like Daniel Hauser, Billy Best was told he would die if he didn't submit to chemotherapy. But with remarkable courage and wisdom about his own body's healing capabilities, Billy Best fled the health authorities, ran away from his family and began eating roots, superfoods and medicinal herbs. He regularly drank an alternative cancer liquid formula (made from plants) and before long his cancer was cured.

Billy, of course, is alive and well today... fifteen years after his cancer doctors said he should be dead.

Billy's recovery proves cancer doctors wrong

The fact that Billy Best is living and breathing today is a huge embarrassment to the arrogant cancer doctors who insist on pushing poison onto children. His very existence proves them wrong. They might have actually preferred that Billy Best died 15 years ago just to prove them right, because with each breath he takes, and with each heartbeat that carries his body into the next moment, Billy Best screams out the obvious truth to the world: Natural medicine allows the body to CURE ITSELF of cancer.

Billy Best is alive and well today, living on superfoods and looking quite healthy. He was recently willing to speak out against the tyrannical cancer authorities on an ABC News video interview you can watch here: http://www.abcnews.go.com/US/story?...

In that interview, when Billy Best was asked if he would help the Hauser family if contacted by them, he says, "I would because it's something that's so close to me." The journalist interviewing him seems astonished that someone would dare help the "fugitive" Hauser family. But Billy Best continues, "It's been, almost, 15 years and to see today someone fighting for those same -- freedoms. ...I'd fight. I'd fight for that freedom."

And with those words, Billy Best cements his position as one of the true American heroes of our time. Taking a stand against the poisoning of children, against the tyranny of modern medicine and even against the idiocy of the mainstream media, Billy Best affirms his basic human right to choose his preferred healing modality.

And yet, it wasn't too long ago that Mr. Best was a fugitive from justice... the subject of an intense manhunt to find a child and, it was claimed, "save his life with chemotherapy."

Who are the real fugitives from the law?

When it comes to cancer and medicine, I say the wrong people are running from the law. The real criminals in medicine today are the egomaniacal oncologists who seek to thrust their toxic chemicals onto families and children. These criminal-minded physicians routinely call for the arrest and imprisonment of parents who dare to disagree with their distorted medical opinions -- and even those opinions are based on nothing but fraudulent science, engineered and paid for by the criminally-operated drug companies selling the chemotherapy chemicals in the first place.

[allmendream]

Diseases with molecular causes often have molecular solutions.

A disease is not CAUSED by a deficiency in a drug, but often a disease can be CURED by the correct drug.

Your analogy is like saying “Cancer is not a deficiency of chemotherapy and surgery.” Correct, Cancer is a failure in molecular signaling of the cellular division function; but chemotherapy and surgery can help to REMOVE a cancerous growth.

Unless you think disease is caused by “ill humors”, nothing a good leeching wouldn't cure in that case.

But if you admit that biological diseases have molecular problems,then it only makes sense that the right molecular solution would curtail or cure it.

[cajungirl]

What does the cost of treatment have to do with it?

Food isn’t free, parents pay for it. Vaccinations aren’t free, parents pay. Breaking a bone and getting treatment isn’t free, parents pay.

That is why people either have insurance, get medicaid, save money or work.

[Caramelgal]

Well all that hippie dippie stuff may well help to reduce the incidence of cancer, but ONCE YOU HAVE CANCER, you had best see the Oncologist as they are highly successful at treating cancer.

I think that a healthy balanced diet; big on lots of fresh vegetables and fruits, whole grains and lean meats and fish – less on the processed foods, salts, processed sugars and additives, along with an active life style, may well reduce the incidence of cancer, but it is not necessarily a guarantee for preventing it as heredity and other factors seem to come into play. But once someone has cancer, a healthy diet and herbal remedies alone is not going to cure it.

My SIL was diagnosed with breast cancer, underwent a double mastectomy and chemo therapy and over 15 years later – is still 100% cancer free. Now if only she could be convinced to stop smoking.

I also knew a gal whose two-year old was diagnosed with Leukemia. It was a rough go for awhile, but she was fortunate to be treated in one of the best hospitals – Johns Hopkins. I ran into this gal not too long ago and she told me that her daughter just graduated from HS and is getting ready to go off to college – completely cured of her cancer.

I am a Molecular Biologist.

I’m not a scientist but I did work for a pharmaceutical company for many years in an accounting function. I got to know many of the scientists on both a professional and personal basis, and they were very dedicated to helping people and not the evil profit driven folks that some people assume they are.

[allmendream]

To me it is a basic socialistic impulse of “How DARE they make money off of sick people!” rather than the capitalist realization that pharma offers people new and better treatment options for their health care dollar.

And yes, scientists in pharma are dedicated to improving the lives of the critically ill. We talk about the bottom line in these tough economic times, but the emphasis is on alleviating human misery through better science.

[SecAmndmt]

“So you are conceding that Oncology has been a great success story in terms of treating cancer”

No, I am not.

Much of big Pharma-based Monopoly Medicine is a failure and some is laughable (eg. the cholesterol scam, pushing the anti-fat/pro-sugar dietary guidelines etc). The fact that big Pharma and Monopoly Medicine use the government to make their treatment protocols mandatory is absolutely not laughable.

“Well all that hippie dippie stuff may well help to reduce the incidence of cancer, but ONCE YOU HAVE CANCER, you had best see the Oncologist as they are highly successful at treating cancer.”

I would see an oncologist if I wanted to limit my post-cancer lifespan to only 5 more years and/or suffer from a number of secondary cancers caused by the chemo and/or radiation.

[Coleus]

714X

Billy Best, ran away from home to avoid chemo. treatments

Billy Best, Cancer, 714X

Teen with cancer can forgo chemotherapy

[allmendream]

Well if you are NOT conceding the point that Oncology has been a great success story in terms of treating cancer you are in abject denial of something we like to call REALITY.

Five, Ten and Fifteen year cancer survival rates are up across the board over the last couple decades. Many cancers that were once a death sentence are now treatable.

How do you explain this?

Another conspiracy theory dredged up to explain it?