Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy Takes Delivery of New Carrier
Military.com ^ | 5/11/09 | Anon

Posted on 05/20/2009 4:18:30 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur

The Navy took delivery of its newest aircraft carrier, USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77), from Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding. George H.W. Bush is the 10th and final Nimitz-class aircraft carrier.

(Excerpt) Read more at military.com ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: armsbuildup; carrier; cvn77; navy; northropgrumman; shipbuilding; ussgeorgehwbush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: WellyP
If that were is ever happen I have some names: The Empty Suit, The Phony, The TOTUS, The Illegal
21 posted on 05/20/2009 7:26:36 AM PDT by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thefrankbaum
I meant to say that the last carrier in the Nimitz class is an iconic event. Our carriers have represented the ability of our presidents to project power since Midway.

Somehow we seem to be at a watershed and the matter of USS George HW Bush is an occasion to reflect on whether our country will be willing or even able to continue to be the policeman of the world.

I have several times posted that we may be misreading Obama if we think he is going to be a pushover in international affairs in the mold of Jimmy Carter. I leave open the possibility that Obama might be very aggressive in the use of force, I have even suggested that war is far more likely under a leftist like Barack Obama than under the likes of George Bush. If Obama thinks that he will compromise his power at home if he is weak abroad, I do not think he will be discouraged in the least by a count of body bags. If he thinks he can project a version of leftism abroad, I think he will do so. My point is that leftists, after they have actually attained power, can be very bloody-minded in the preservation or extension of that power.

Our carriers have always been a platform to project power, one wonders what Obama will do in that realm whether or not to project power from a flat top or from a weapon in space.


22 posted on 05/20/2009 7:31:58 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
Thank you. I was not aware you had argued these points in the past; that said, I'm in agreement with you generally, although I don't believe he will have enough political capital domestically to achieve many of those ends. Approval ratings in the 50s is not enough to galvanize public will to pursue such a course, and, while a terrorist event would steel the public to pursue such a course, it would justify the accusations of Cheney et al. that he has made the country less safe.
23 posted on 05/20/2009 8:06:52 AM PDT by thefrankbaum (Ad maiorem Dei gloriam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Here's the Big Guy itself:


24 posted on 05/20/2009 9:09:01 AM PDT by NCC-1701 (ON 1-19-09 GAS WAS, ON AVERAGE IN MEMPHIS, $1.43 A GALLON.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson